2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Considering 4:10's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #1  
SCstanger's Avatar
SCstanger
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 149
From: Mississippi
Default Considering 4:10's

For my next mod i'm considering a set of 4:10's ..I would like to hear from the 05/06 owners out there who have had em installed..Did it pick the car up that much?..Any regrets in having them? How bad did it kill your gas milage?
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 10:24 AM
  #2  
GotYoNacho's Avatar
GotYoNacho
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 104
From:
Default RE: Considering 4:10's

I'll let you know after tomorrow. Supposed to pick up my car Friday evening.
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 01:53 PM
  #3  
MikeHawke's Avatar
MikeHawke
Retired MF Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,156
From: I live in Canada, eh
Default RE: Considering 4:10's

I know my car is not a 3 valve but i went from the stock 3.27s to 4.10s and my mileage did not go down at all. It is not as much of a change from your 3.55s as it was for me.

At high speed on the highway, I think you would lose a little bit of efficiency because the RPs will be higher but as long as you keep your foot out of it it should be fine.
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
nanaki's Avatar
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: Considering 4:10's

ORIGINAL: MikeHawke

I know my car is not a 3 valve but i went from the stock 3.27s to 4.10s and my mileage did not go down at all. It is not as much of a change from your 3.55s as it was for me.

At high speed on the highway, I think you would lose a little bit of efficiency because the RPs will be higher but as long as you keep your foot out of it it should be fine.
hahahaha! good luck with that. when that little unf unf of acceleration is there, it's hard not to slam your foot at every stop light.
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 01:59 PM
  #5  
mac10chap's Avatar
mac10chap
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,660
From: houston, tx
Default RE: Considering 4:10's

[sm=exactly.gif]

i put on the 3.73's and it is still hard to keep my foot out of it...i could only imagine if i would have gone with the 4.10's. the only thing you are gonna do is lose top speed and have higher rpm's at those higher speeds. it's a good trade off though.
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #6  
discofan's Avatar
discofan
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 390
From: Chicago, IL
Default RE: Considering 4:10's

Dear Mac10chap,

I just want to compliment you on the look of your car...

It is "SMOKIN'"...

I also had the 3.73s installed and later a supercharger...

Best all around gear selection...

Strong acceleration, good highway performance and not too much gear for the addition of an S/C..

Best of Luck, Dave

Old Sep 8, 2005 | 02:44 PM
  #7  
fin1's Avatar
fin1
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 117
From:
Default RE: Considering 4:10's

Running 4:10 and recommend them, even with a blower. No noticible loss of MPG.
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 02:55 PM
  #8  
GotYoNacho's Avatar
GotYoNacho
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 104
From:
Default RE: Considering 4:10's

if traction becomes a problem, just go with more rubber

already got 295's out back (on a 10" rim)
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 10:12 PM
  #9  
Spencer069's Avatar
Spencer069
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 133
From:
Default RE: Considering 4:10's

what is the car supposed to come with? someone said 3.55's

however i when putting on my slp's i notice the rear differential box read "Ford 3.31"
Old Sep 9, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #10  
GotYoNacho's Avatar
GotYoNacho
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 104
From:
Default RE: Considering 4:10's

3.55's for the manuals... Auto's came with something lower...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 PM.