2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Supercharging a 'Vert

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 08:53 PM
  #1  
LaserGT's Avatar
LaserGT
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 321
From: Illinois
Question Supercharging a 'Vert

I picked up an issue of MM & FF tonight and I saw an ad for the new Paxton S/C. It claims that it produces 600 hp at the flywheel at only 8 pounds of boost. Well that gets me to start dreaming. My question is, what would I need to do to reinforce the chassis for that much additional power?
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 09:58 PM
  #2  
onederful100's Avatar
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,130
From: Honolulu, HI
Default

you dont need to reinforce anything.
but if you are worried about body twisting, you can add subframe connectors and a roll cage.
but a roll cage isn't too street friendly. but depends on the # of points on the cage.
but if you want to add the SC, you can do that without anything else.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 10:57 PM
  #3  
daredevil95's Avatar
daredevil95
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,473
From: CT
Default

The vert's frame are pretty strong to begin with, you wouldn't have to do anything to beef up the frame. If you plan on taking it down the track, most tracks will insist on a roll cage for any verts running 13.50 and faster, which you are probably already at or faster. Research different types of centrifugal and whipple type superchargers, you may prefer a whipple type after doing some research. There are a ton options for supercharging. Good luck.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 11:07 PM
  #4  
LaserGT's Avatar
LaserGT
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 321
From: Illinois
Default

If I were to drive it that hard where I'd cause body twist then I'd better park the Stang. Thanks for the info, that's good to know I don't have to do anything with the chassis if I get more power.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 11:17 PM
  #5  
LaserGT's Avatar
LaserGT
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 321
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by daredevil95
The vert's frame are pretty strong to begin with, you wouldn't have to do anything to beef up the frame. If you plan on taking it down the track, most tracks will insist on a roll cage for any verts running 13.50 and faster, which you are probably already at or faster. Research different types of centrifugal and whipple type superchargers, you may prefer a whipple type after doing some research. There are a ton options for supercharging. Good luck.
Thanks. I wouldn't take it to the track but I'd just want to have more power under the hood (like who of us wouldn't). But is there a big difference between the centrifugal and whipple type S/C when it comes to the boost and when it kicks in? You'll have to excuse me because I'm a noob when it comes to superchargers.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #6  
danzcool's Avatar
danzcool
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,071
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by LaserGT
...But is there a big difference between the centrifugal and whipple type S/C when it comes to the boost and when it kicks in? You'll have to excuse me because I'm a noob when it comes to superchargers.
Oh yeah.
Twin screw and TVS style superchargers have loads of torque at lower RPMs, but the centifugals have more power at high RPMs, so at 3000RPMs the whipple will have more power, at 6000RPMs the centrifugal will have more power, not sure where they tend to cross over though.
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 11:42 PM
  #7  
LaserGT's Avatar
LaserGT
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 321
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by danzcool
Oh yeah.
Twin screw and TVS style superchargers have loads of torque at lower RPMs, but the centifugals have more power at high RPMs, so at 3000RPMs the whipple will have more power, at 6000RPMs the centrifugal will have more power, not sure where they tend to cross over though.
That's REALLY good to know. I'm looking more for the power to come in at the low end so it looks like the whipple type is the way I want to go. Thanks to everyone for their input, it's been really helpful.
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 01:35 AM
  #8  
danzcool's Avatar
danzcool
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,071
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by LaserGT
That's REALLY good to know. I'm looking more for the power to come in at the low end so it looks like the whipple type is the way I want to go. Thanks to everyone for their input, it's been really helpful.
Of course, I know a guy who used a centrifugal and sprayed nitrous oxide at lower RPMs to overcome that issue... but that's getting a bit complex.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
Oct 1, 2015 09:21 AM
col2560
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
3
Sep 25, 2015 08:59 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.