Wouldn't this suck?
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 141
From: VA
Last edited by HIS S-197; Apr 5, 2012 at 09:08 AM.
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 116
From: Colorado
I can't believe they would make a change to the 2014 model after the changes they made to the 2013. That would make the 2013 a one year run. I can see the 2015 come out in May or June of 2014 and call them 2014 1/2 until September. Now that would make sense.
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 141
From: VA
On topic...
In marketing this phenomenon is referred to as planned obsolescence:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence
If you are irrevocably compelled to be on the "cutting edge" of technology/keep up with the Jonses'/have the newest or "rawest" (as you put it) thing out there then I can see how this can be discouraging but it's the nature of the beast.
In any case, you always have the option of trading-in/trading-up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence
If you are irrevocably compelled to be on the "cutting edge" of technology/keep up with the Jonses'/have the newest or "rawest" (as you put it) thing out there then I can see how this can be discouraging but it's the nature of the beast.
In any case, you always have the option of trading-in/trading-up.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 337
From: Massachusetts
"If we bought the 2015 mustang for the anniversary, and Ford turns around and does something rawer for 2016, just like the 2010 and then the 2011 came out"
Hey, I resemble that remark!
All I know is you have two choices: Wait for the perfect ride, or RIDE! lol
Hey, I resemble that remark!
All I know is you have two choices: Wait for the perfect ride, or RIDE! lol
4th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,335
From: Buffalo, New York
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,378
From: Galveston, Texas
4th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,335
From: Buffalo, New York