Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GT -> GT500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2012, 05:09 PM
  #21  
Toxix
2nd Gear Member
 
Toxix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Warpig12354
Well if you ask me, the GT-R would destroy more than half of the Mustangs on here in the quarter and nearly all of them on the track so...
+1.....<3 the GTR
Toxix is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 05:57 PM
  #22  
Sequence
 
Sequence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 45
Default

very jealous... one day I will be in a GT500 and GT-R
Sequence is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 06:07 PM
  #23  
Jas5
3rd Gear Member
 
Jas5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: OK
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by angryBits
The only complaints about the Nismo 370z is the visibility is TERRIBLE. It's scary changing lanes when you have such a large blindspot. Only other problem is, no real low-end torque. I love the low grunt.

Definitely posting pics as soon as it comes in!


I see what you mean.. tiny rear windows. I guess they went more for aesthetic and less functionality, but hey, it is a sports car. But with all that $ you have i'm surprised you didnt slap a supercharger on there

But, I can't think of anything that compares to the GT500 in terms of daily functionality and raw power. I.E. the corvette ZR1 would be a bitch to get in and out of, especially in tight parking spaces. Surprised you didn't consider a used GT-R, though
Jas5 is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 06:35 PM
  #24  
Warpig12354
3rd Gear Member
 
Warpig12354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by Young_Gun
Comparing the Nissan GT-R to any other Nissan is like comparing the Lexus LFA to any other Lexus.
Not really, just because they're both flagship cars doesn't mean they can compare the same to the companies other cars. The LFA goes for 375,000 (base) while the GT-R goes for 96,000 and compared to Nismo 370z's 41k price tag.
Warpig12354 is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 07:11 PM
  #25  
aclass
3rd Gear Member
 
aclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mtns, VA
Posts: 524
Default

Congratulations.
Sold my 07GT which was an absolute blast and took advantage of all the 2013 lust and found a nice deal on a loaded 2012 with 3019 miles. Still getting acclimated to the car but am loving it so far.
aclass is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 07:25 PM
  #26  
Jas5
3rd Gear Member
 
Jas5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: OK
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by Warpig12354
The LFA goes for 375,000 (base) while the GT-R goes for 96,000 and compared to Nismo 370z's 41k price tag.
Holy crap, I remember when they came out a few years ago they were $80k to compete with the ZR1 vette... guess they keep dumping technology and $ into them.


Originally Posted by aclass
Congratulations.
Sold my 07GT which was an absolute blast and took advantage of all the 2013 lust and found a nice deal on a loaded 2012 with 3019 miles. Still getting acclimated to the car but am loving it so far.
Update your sig brotha! Be proud! I like to ask this, but how does a blown 4.6L compare to your new 5.0 N/A...? In terms of which was more fun to drive. The sound of a blower is intoxicating

Last edited by Jas5; 06-03-2012 at 07:28 PM.
Jas5 is offline  
Old 06-04-2012, 04:20 AM
  #27  
Chrisc33
1st Gear Member
 
Chrisc33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 117
Default

U think your 13 will be in the use market in 14 might consider taking it from your hands lol jk
Chrisc33 is offline  
Old 06-04-2012, 07:11 PM
  #28  
aclass
3rd Gear Member
 
aclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mtns, VA
Posts: 524
Default

Originally Posted by Jas5
Update your sig brotha! Be proud! I like to ask this, but how does a blown 4.6L compare to your new 5.0 N/A...? In terms of which was more fun to drive. The sound of a blower is intoxicating
You're right, I need to work on my photobucket and quit trolling for mods.
As far as your question goes, my s/c 4.6 was the funnest car I've ever driven and I'm on my way in making the Shelby the same. Currently, my GT500 is totally stock, the initial punch is nowhere near as "violent" as the GT but when the rpm's and boost goes up, the seats have their work cut out for them, as do the tires.
A tune, pulley, air filter, and some noise, and the Shelby should really wake up and be really fun as it approaches the 600rwhp mark. But right now, it's too quiet and smooth.
aclass is offline  
Old 06-04-2012, 07:12 PM
  #29  
aclass
3rd Gear Member
 
aclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mtns, VA
Posts: 524
Default

Originally Posted by aclass
You're right, I need to work on my photobucket and quit trolling for mods.
As far as your question goes, my s/c 4.6 was the funnest car I've ever driven and I'm on my way in making the Shelby the same. Currently, my GT500 is totally stock, the initial punch is nowhere near as "violent" as the GT but when the rpm's and boost goes up, the seats have their work cut out for them, as do the tires.
A tune, pulley, air filter, and some noise, and the Shelby should really wake up and be really fun as it approaches the 600rwhp mark. But right now, it's too quiet and smooth.
By the way, the GT500 is a 5.4 and blown.
aclass is offline  
Old 06-04-2012, 07:17 PM
  #30  
07BLACKGT
5th Gear Member
 
07BLACKGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,935
Default

Congrats bro!! Can't wait to see pictures of an all black '13 GT500

GTR's aren't (relatively) fun to drive. I'd take a '13 GT500 over a GTR any day of the week.

This 13 500 should be a keeper for sure.. talk about low-end grunt!!
07BLACKGT is offline  


Quick Reply: GT -> GT500



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.