Brake Pads
Hawk pads? They seem to be more highly rated than the Akebonos by the reviewers - though I tend to wonder about that...
Front: http://a.co/d/grx5Vnb
Rear: http://a.co/d/fGzp6F4
Front: http://a.co/d/grx5Vnb
Rear: http://a.co/d/fGzp6F4
These days I'm running either Carbotech (1521/Bobcat) or G-loc (GS-1) for the two cars in my sig that do not see any track time. Track-rated compounds of XP or R designation on the Mustang. The improved bite is absolutely worth the higher price point. I think these are some sort of ceramic formulation, but they're more stopping-power oriented than most other ceramic pads (that are primarily sold on the basis of them being 'ceramics').
Norm
I'm very happy with the Hawk ceramic pads that I have at the front. The stopping power is very good, the pedal feel is progressive, they're pretty fade resistant, and there's virtually no dust.
The only downside is that they don't bite so well when very cold so they're not the best choice if you get Arctic weather.
The only downside is that they don't bite so well when very cold so they're not the best choice if you get Arctic weather.
Heh, TOTALLY AGREE. Overwhelmingly, the pads were either AWSOME or they SUCKED. Not a lot of middle ground.
I noticed, too, a lot of folks wanted brakes that didn't put out *all that brake dust,* and these pads *kept the car looking good, but they squealed like a stuck pig* - so, like you say, the demographic... The reviews I really cared about were performance, fade resistance, not the Brembo pads, etc. Truly, some folks seem to think you can get something for nothing, that there's no trade-off. I'll put up with a little noise if I get great performance. I don't want pads that will be loose and make clacking noises in the calipers, etc.
Currently, the pads in this care are squealy as Hell, and while I was getting an alignment, the guy said the pads have a lot of life on them. I think I'm going to jack 'er up and check the front left pads because something is noisy in there, we all know... a noise annoys!
I noticed, too, a lot of folks wanted brakes that didn't put out *all that brake dust,* and these pads *kept the car looking good, but they squealed like a stuck pig* - so, like you say, the demographic... The reviews I really cared about were performance, fade resistance, not the Brembo pads, etc. Truly, some folks seem to think you can get something for nothing, that there's no trade-off. I'll put up with a little noise if I get great performance. I don't want pads that will be loose and make clacking noises in the calipers, etc.
Currently, the pads in this care are squealy as Hell, and while I was getting an alignment, the guy said the pads have a lot of life on them. I think I'm going to jack 'er up and check the front left pads because something is noisy in there, we all know... a noise annoys!
The only real trade off with ceramics as Dino Dino and I already mentioned, less initial bite. Especially in cold weather. Here in Central AZ area we only see about a weeks worth of sub-zero temps. When it gets "cold" I just come up on the stop signs on the way out of my neighborhood a little slower to get them warmed up, then drive like usual.
During the summer it can reach up to 110F in the surrounding mountains so I have experienced some brake fade with the Akebono's when I push the car going through some windy mountain roads with lots of switch backs. For DD On the freeway and surface streets, no such issues even with temps hitting 118F. I'd look at my rotors before the pads to start with though because I'm on the OEM rotors.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



