400 rwhp and reliability
ok ...
now i know that 400hp and reliability might not go hand in hand...
but i'm looking to get 400rwhp our of my 1992 coupe and keep it a good daily driver. think i should go for a n/a 302 build, power added 302 ... or ditch the 302 for a 350 and go from there!?
i also want my car to work well on the twisties (i'll be upgrading to MM suspenision) ....
now i know that 400hp and reliability might not go hand in hand...
but i'm looking to get 400rwhp our of my 1992 coupe and keep it a good daily driver. think i should go for a n/a 302 build, power added 302 ... or ditch the 302 for a 350 and go from there!?
i also want my car to work well on the twisties (i'll be upgrading to MM suspenision) ....
ORIGINAL: jonnyslick
or ditch the 302 for a 350 and go from there!?
or ditch the 302 for a 350 and go from there!?
im going the 351 route soon for similar goals myself, seems cheaper/more reliable than a 302
ORIGINAL: kilobyte
you do know you can drop a ls1 in a fox body with the 4.6 k member and very little fab work. but i don't want to get flamed so i will stop here
you do know you can drop a ls1 in a fox body with the 4.6 k member and very little fab work. but i don't want to get flamed so i will stop here


ORIGINAL: kilobyte
you do know you can drop a ls1 in a fox body with the 4.6 k member and very little fab work. but i don't want to get flamed so i will stop here
you do know you can drop a ls1 in a fox body with the 4.6 k member and very little fab work. but i don't want to get flamed so i will stop here
now, the 351w is way more reliable than the 302 if you want to run big numbers. and easy to tune to the bigger numbers. look around and you'll find some more info on these motors and tuneability
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
Oct 5, 2015 07:16 AM




