351 Mustang

400 HP to the wheels?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2008, 05:44 PM
  #21  
Cleeman99
3rd Gear Member
 
Cleeman99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 547
Default

i would lean more up wards of 0.650,0.700 and you would want to go with a 1.7 rocker
but i high recommend a custom cam its highly worth them and a refresh would be 0.010 the 0.030 is more less adding cubs. if you want street wise i recommend a afr 185, and for cam trick flow stage 2 would be very streetable and give you a good street/stip car.
hope this helps u

p.s. elec water pumps are alright i dont use them i was think of using one on my build im doing now

Last edited by Cleeman99; 09-18-2008 at 06:20 PM.
Cleeman99 is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 10:48 AM
  #22  
wildcobrar
3rd Gear Member
 
wildcobrar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 577
Default

Originally Posted by glaranotch
hi guys. i have a 1982 351W. what would you recommend in order for me to gain 400 horse power to the wheels?? does it require a stroker kit?? is it possible to just be naturally aspirated?? thanks guys your combos would help a bunch.

Humor me here, is 400 HP to the tires in the ball park of 500 at the flywheel? I know what i built to attain that on 351 cubes and it is vary narly. Idles with a heavy thump and has manual brakes because of such low engine vacumn. Now this engine is naturally aspirated and given my experience 351 inches or less to make 400 to the rear wheels on engine is not tame by any means.

Therefore, going naturally aspirated I would go for the cubes(408) and the engine would still have a heavy thump but still be a great driver. Power adder?? Now that can be an equalizer on a smaller inch displacement.

Joe
wildcobrar is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 11:54 PM
  #23  
glaranotch
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
glaranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 180
Default

wildcobrar i dont understand what you are trying to say. Are saying that it is not only very much hard work to just obtain 500 horsepower at the FLYWHEEL, but it is also dangerous and unpractical?What do you mean by "not tame"? I dont know if your talking about your personal naturally aspirated 408W engine.

BUT if you read in this months "Engine Master" magazine COVER story, they cover a 351W making 536 HP on pump gas. not only did they keep the STOCK crank, but they also bored the engine to a 4.030 bore with a 3.500 inches of stroke, making it now a 358W. Using AFR 205cc cylinder heads with 1.6 rocker ratio and at 10:48:1 compression. also using a holley carb. making 455hp/488tq at 4,900 RPM. and 536hp/433tq at 6500 WITH a FLAT TAPPED CAM.

narly? i think so

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/hot...sor/index.html
glaranotch is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 01:13 AM
  #24  
jtmustang
5th Gear Member
 
jtmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: arlington,WA
Posts: 3,743
Default

yeah and if u wanted to make more swap to a solid cam and vic jr and u would pick up another 25-50 hp.

but none the less a very solid motor and with a stick behind it it would make 440-460 rwhp and pump gas. but that motor is still a little pricey 6-8000 bucks
jtmustang is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 10:29 AM
  #25  
wildcobrar
3rd Gear Member
 
wildcobrar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 577
Default

Originally Posted by glaranotch
wildcobrar i dont understand what you are trying to say. Are saying that it is not only very much hard work to just obtain 500 horsepower at the FLYWHEEL, but it is also dangerous and unpractical?What do you mean by "not tame"? I dont know if your talking about your personal naturally aspirated 408W engine.

BUT if you read in this months "Engine Master" magazine COVER story, they cover a 351W making 536 HP on pump gas. not only did they keep the STOCK crank, but they also bored the engine to a 4.030 bore with a 3.500 inches of stroke, making it now a 358W. Using AFR 205cc cylinder heads with 1.6 rocker ratio and at 10:48:1 compression. also using a holley carb. making 455hp/488tq at 4,900 RPM. and 536hp/433tq at 6500 WITH a FLAT TAPPED CAM.

narly? i think so

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/hot...sor/index.html
No no, nat dangerous or unpractical. Just not well mannered drivability wise. It does not have enough goods for power brakes bieng applied within short intervals of each other. The idle is quite wild and the power is up in the higher rpm region. Don't get me wrong, I like what I built. But most people would not like the harshness that comes with smaller cubes and that kind of power. Mine is 351 stock crank and rods. Now a 408 with that same power and you have something that goes like it is possessed and still have that good old tame driving qualities like a stock 5.0. Maybe this engine masters 351 is like that. I don't know. But I do know what my engine is like. And I know what kind of power it makes.

Joe
wildcobrar is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 06:53 PM
  #26  
207stangerfstbk
 
207stangerfstbk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: iowa
Posts: 10
Default

I just posted the new sound clips from the new "Blood" Line of exhaust systems from MagnaFlow. They are still in the testing phase and say they will have them for retail sale in early winter http://reignofblood.net/link.php?n=80220 its NASTY!
207stangerfstbk is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 09:59 PM
  #27  
cryptic26djp
4th Gear Member
 
cryptic26djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,085
Default

I actually read this article and liked the setup and numbers. How much do you think it would cost to replicate this engine? And does this list include everything?

PERFORMANCE UNLIMITED 358CI SMALL-BLOCK FORD
Bore: 4.030 inches
Stroke: 3.500 inches
Displacement: 358 cubic inches
Compression ratio: 10.48:1
Camshaft: COMP hydraulic, flat tappet
Cam duration: 240/246 degrees at .050-inch tappet rise
Cam lobe lift: .360/.364 inch
Rocker ratio: COMP Magnum 1.6 ratio
Lobe separation: 108 degrees
Installed centerline: 102 degrees
Top ring: 1.2mm JE
Top ring gap: .020 inch
Second ring: 1.5mm JE
Second ring gap: .022 inch
Oil ring: 3mm JE
Piston: JE, dished top
Block: OEM Ford 351W
Crankshaft: OEM Ford 351W
Rods: Eagle SIR 5.959-inch I-beam
Main journal: 2.620 inches
Main bearing clearance: .0022 inch
Rod journal: 2.070 inches
Rod bearing clearance: .0020 inch
Cylinder head: AFR 205
Peak intake flow: 295 cfm
Intake valve diameter: 2.080 inches
Exhaust valve diameter: 1.600 inches
Intake manifold: Edelbrock Performer RPM
Carburetor: Holley 4150 modified to 1,070 cfm by Charlie Morgan
Header: Mac 1 3/4 Fox-body Windsor; 3-inch collector
Ignition: MSD 6AL
Damper: TCI Rattler
Water pump: Meziere
cryptic26djp is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 11:26 PM
  #28  
jtmustang
5th Gear Member
 
jtmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: arlington,WA
Posts: 3,743
Default

5-8000 grand including machine work and no not everything for a complete motor is listed oil pump,oil pan , pickup,distributor,plugs,flywheel or flexplate,r. rockers,pushrods,valve covers, and probably more


why not for the same price or alittle more a 408,418, or 427 and make more power for a few bucks more?
jtmustang is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 11:50 PM
  #29  
cryptic26djp
4th Gear Member
 
cryptic26djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,085
Default

I dont want to hijack this thread - but if that last question was for me... I simply do not need more than 530Hp. Also, I would only be comfortable with a 30 over bore. Anything larger, although you can make them last forever, just scares the crap out of me. I cant see putting that kind of money in to something when it is pushing the limits of the block. Just my opinion.
cryptic26djp is offline  
Old 10-24-2008, 12:07 AM
  #30  
jtmustang
5th Gear Member
 
jtmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: arlington,WA
Posts: 3,743
Default

^^^^ 530 hp is not pushing the limits at all on a 351 windsor

and going to the bigger cubic inch windsors does not require bigger overbore the cubes come from different crank,rod and piston combos
jtmustang is offline  


Quick Reply: 400 HP to the wheels?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.