357 vs 393
Dec 26, 2005 | 05:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,392
From: Rochester, NY
RE: 357 vs 393
contact the manufacturer of the kit. they will b able to tell u
Dec 27, 2005 | 12:28 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 309
RE: 357 vs 393
You said it yourself. Go with the cubic inches. I have never regretted paying for cubes, I've always sworn at paying for revs.
Dec 29, 2005 | 04:05 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,042
From: Hamilton, NJ
RE: 357 vs 393
393W Soon! (not soon enough...) for me! I was going to go w/ a power adder but this is my first build so I figured I would keep it somewhat simple and not TOO much power.
Dec 29, 2005 | 08:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,392
From: Rochester, NY
RE: 357 vs 393
ohh, trust me, you will not be low on power. assuming 100% volumetric efficiency (very doable) you will have 400 crank hp!
Jan 4, 2006 | 06:28 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,042
From: Hamilton, NJ
RE: 357 vs 393
I should have alot more than than w/ a 393W, AFR 205's, Air Gap (thanks guys
), and a nice cam. Dont you think?
Jan 4, 2006 | 07:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,392
From: Rochester, NY
RE: 357 vs 393
Quote:
ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT
I should have alot more than than w/ a 393W, AFR 205's, Air Gap (thanks guys
), and a nice cam. Dont you think?
ya 450 is a realistic rumber
Jan 6, 2006 | 05:02 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,042
From: Hamilton, NJ
RE: 357 vs 393
Sounds good to me... whatever it is I know that I will be happy. I drive a dodge intrepid everyday, I would be happy w/ a stock 5.0
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MuscleOwnzRice
General Tech
1
Dec 12, 2006 10:52 PM
92civy
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
11
Dec 10, 2006 08:16 PM
Glasersil
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
7
Oct 20, 2006 02:20 AM
flyingt
GT S197 General Discussion
6
Apr 27, 2005 07:03 PM
mustangboy393
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
1
Jan 6, 2005 11:11 AM
357 ,
393 ,
393w ,
balancer ,
chp ,
dyno ,
fit ,
floating ,
forged ,
forum ,
fps ,
pins ,
pistons ,
pressed ,
probe ,
pulleys ,
turbos ,
wrist
RE: 357 vs 393
), and a nice cam. Dont you think?
