4.0L V6 Technical Discussions Any questions about engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

Is the 4.0L V6 Engine Good or Bad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 12:09 PM
  #1  
Nordrel's Avatar
Nordrel
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
From: Georgia
Default Is the 4.0L V6 Engine Good or Bad

I just recently purchased a 2008 v6 Mustang with the 4.0L and I wanted to know how reliable the engine itself is. I bought it with 94k Miles. just let me know what you guys think.
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 12:28 PM
  #2  
Rudolph Hucker's Avatar
Rudolph Hucker
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,128
From: sweden
Default

they say 300k miles is possible..
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 12:53 PM
  #3  
So_Cali's Avatar
So_Cali
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,214
From: Sunny California!!!
Default

Gonna sound like a broken record but, it all depends on how well it was taken care throughout those 94K. Hopefully she came with maintenance records on any services perfomed on the car. The 4.0 is a pretty solid engine, I'm at 135K still going strong with no major issues (knock on wood)
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 01:12 PM
  #4  
tigercrazy718's Avatar
tigercrazy718
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,731
From: Houston, Texas
Default

this would prob be better in the v6 specific section, but ppl have run superchargers on their engines well past 100k, along with nitrous past 100k. all depends on how well you take care of it and it was taken care of
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 03:36 PM
  #5  
kput's Avatar
kput
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,207
From: NE
Default

They're great engines..
I've heard of them handling pretty high level of boost too
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 04:04 PM
  #6  
kzonts's Avatar
kzonts
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,114
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by kput
They're great engines..
I've heard of them handling pretty high level of boost too
Mine has responded well to the boost, but I only have 51k on the motor. Has some nice torque for a v6. It was a slow pig before that. :-)
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 06:20 PM
  #7  
Speed Buggy's Avatar
Speed Buggy
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 41
From: CA
Default

Probably something to ask BEFORE you buy
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 10:16 PM
  #8  
JimC's Avatar
JimC
Super Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,882
From: Michigan again!
Default

The 4.0 is a very strong engine.

I ran a 75 shot of nitrous on my 2006 for 2 seasons. At 90,000 miles I pulled the nitrous and installed the Xcharger (Dave at Explorer Express said it was the highest mileage initial install he knew of at that time).

When I sold the car after ordering the 2013 it was still running strong on 10-12 lbs of boost, making mid 12 second passes, and had 203,000 miles on it. The new owner said the compression tested fine and he is planning to take it to the track this upcoming season.
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 10:41 PM
  #9  
Nuke's Avatar
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,182
From: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Default

I'd expect some minor issues such as accessories failing but overall the 4.0 is a pretty tough engine. Ford seems to skimp on the accessories.
Old Feb 23, 2013 | 05:08 AM
  #10  
kzonts's Avatar
kzonts
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,114
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by JimC
The 4.0 is a very strong engine.

I ran a 75 shot of nitrous on my 2006 for 2 seasons. At 90,000 miles I pulled the nitrous and installed the Xcharger (Dave at Explorer Express said it was the highest mileage initial install he knew of at that time).

When I sold the car after ordering the 2013 it was still running strong on 10-12 lbs of boost, making mid 12 second passes, and had 203,000 miles on it. The new owner said the compression tested fine and he is planning to take it to the track this upcoming season.
I'd say this is enough proof to confirm the reliability! Your experience made my decision to boost much easier. Hopefully I'll have the same results.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM.