forget the 4.6 2v

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

03-08-2006, 03:06 AM

#41

monkeydude3

6th Gear Member

Join Date: Sep 2005

Location:

Posts: 5,128

RE: forget the 4.6 2v

DUDE I just looked at your cardomain site, and your camaro is a freaking torque monster!!! NICE CAR!!!

yes, I have seen that movie and it rocks!

OK GONE FOR GOOD BYE ALL

George

03-08-2006, 03:09 AM

#42

1981gMachine

1st Gear Member

Join Date: Feb 2006

Location:

Posts: 136

RE: forget the 4.6 2v

Quote:

ORIGINAL: monkeydude3

DUDE I just looked at your cardomain site, and your camaro is a freaking torque monster!!! NICE CAR!!!

yes, I have seen that movie and it rocks!

OK GONE FOR GOOD BYE ALL

George

Thanks, my next mod is making fender flares from scrath in my street rod class. Then mini tub and fuel cell. After that I will be able to tuck the 12" wide tires in the back and lower the car another 1-2" overall.

03-08-2006, 05:17 AM

#43

GSXRIntensity

4th Gear Member

Join Date: May 2003

Location: Chi-town!!!

Posts: 1,205

RE: forget the 4.6 2v

Quote:

ORIGINAL: XxphantomsnypzxX

Im just kinda mad at the whole 2v 4.6. It's so dumb how Maros can make so much more power, and can handle more power without forged internals. grrrrrr

If you don't want to push the 2V get a 5.4L Cobra R shortblock and heads hooked up; you'll be just fine. You 'can' order the equipment. Ford offers what you need to satisfy your rwhp &rwft-lb needs.

Before I bought the Mustang, I looked a used FireHawk, a used 01 SS, and a brand spankin new WS.6 w/the paper still on the car, so I DEFINITELY love F-bodies. I ended up with the Mustang, because I was able to get it on the 'A' plan through Ford, and on top of that I didn't have to sell my bike to get it. Had I went w/the WS.6, I'd have had to have gotten rid of my truck, bike & would have had no other ride but the car. I am happy w/the Mustang. It has been good to me, & I don't seem to have any problems spanking "Maros.