2003 SVT Cobra vs. 2004 Mach 1
#11
RE: 2003 SVT Cobra vs. 2004 Mach 1
Cobras have IRS and a t-56, machs have a solid rear end and a t-3560 tranny, machs also have a higher compression ratio so if you want to put on a blower it will only handel a few PSI. the cobra responds good to mods, i remeber nanaki telling me he saw a cobra get 25 RWHP fro a filter, NOT A CAI, filter!
#12
RE: 2003 SVT Cobra vs. 2004 Mach 1
ORIGINAL: XbcSharpShooter
I would buy the Mach 1, the rear suspension is better, the 03 cobra had a couple problems, and for the money, you can take the mach 1, supercharge it, make it faster than the cobra, and pay about the same price...
I would buy the Mach 1, the rear suspension is better, the 03 cobra had a couple problems, and for the money, you can take the mach 1, supercharge it, make it faster than the cobra, and pay about the same price...
But then you are at the engines limitations, where it is much cheaper to simply swap out the IRS on the Cobra, have an engine that can handle 700+ HP and a transmission that takes a moron to break. Unlike the Mach1 that has the same crappy 3650 tranny.
Bottom line is, the Cobra is a better car to start with. The only potential upgrade will be the rear end and the swap would be less than $3,000.
In the Mach, you will reach the engines limitations at about 450-500hp and the tranny will be a weaklink also.
Whatever your budget is dude, buy the best you can and work from there.
Personally, I don't have the free time, patience or shops around me to properly build up a car without doing it all myself and having to spend ridiculous amounts of money and traveling to do it.
#14
RE: 2003 SVT Cobra vs. 2004 Mach 1
ORIGINAL: Dalthius
I love the Mach 1...the look, the feel, all of it. I'd go with the Mach simply because it's a Mach.
I love the Mach 1...the look, the feel, all of it. I'd go with the Mach simply because it's a Mach.
#15
RE: 2003 SVT Cobra vs. 2004 Mach 1
i have a mach and i say cobra. I like the looks of my car better but cobras are amazingly fast. Either way you will be happy. A mach with a 8psi blower will be a beast but its no cobra. But if i had enough to buy a cobra and only wanted about 450rwhp then id get the mach and put a blower on it then enjoy paying cheaper insureance. Just look at what you want to do in the future
#16
RE: 2003 SVT Cobra vs. 2004 Mach 1
I'd probably go with an 03/04 Cobra then do all the engine and chassis mods I have done to my '02 GT, and then get rid of that IRS for a solid rear axle! With what everyone has said about the forgred internals and compression I am not goint to repeat it all. The Cobra is the overall best buy unless you are swayed towards the Mach for other reasons (i.e. retro looking interior & etc).
#17
RE: 2003 SVT Cobra vs. 2004 Mach 1
if you want to keep it stock go with the mach 1 for sure but if you are sirous about speed and think about upgrading def go with the 03-04 cobra. they are built better then the mach 1 and has a engine and a tranny that can take some sirous power.
#20
RE: 2003 SVT Cobra vs. 2004 Mach 1
Mach 1 :-p There are fewer (albeit not that much) and hell, its a Mach1... Though if all you want is insane speed... go cobra... Me personally, Yea, I'm dumping a total of about $10,000 but I'll be at 800+ rwhp (new forged internals @ 9.2:1 c/r(dss pro-x series), T4 turbonetics TT, and a t-56 swap :-p