4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

GT performance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #1  
mustangfan22's Avatar
mustangfan22
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 34
From: Ft. Hood TX
Default GT performance?

On a stock 2003 GT what was the 0 - 60 and 1/4 times?
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #2  
04ShakinSteed's Avatar
04ShakinSteed
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,617
From: Reading, Pa.
Default RE: GT performance?

On a stock GT:

0-60 - 5.6 sec

1/4 mile - 13.7 sec (depends on the driver)
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 06:24 PM
  #3  
98LS1's Avatar
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
Default RE: GT performance?

ORIGINAL: 03BlackSteed

On a stock GT:

0-60 - 5.6 sec

1/4 mile - 13.7 sec (depends on the driver)
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 06:36 PM
  #4  
04ShakinSteed's Avatar
04ShakinSteed
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,617
From: Reading, Pa.
Default RE: GT performance?

If you have an opinion on that, let us know.
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #5  
98LS1's Avatar
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
Default RE: GT performance?

I was just laughing on the (depends on driver) thing considering most won't get outta the 14's....Going strictly by weight/hp ration a new GT can't run lower than 14.2's.
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #6  
04ShakinSteed's Avatar
04ShakinSteed
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,617
From: Reading, Pa.
Default RE: GT performance?

If you have a good driver in the seat, my friend, you can get the GT to do 13.5 1/4. Doesn't happen very much but average is probably 13.9.

I think my mom could do a 14.2....and she can't drive a stick!!! LMAO!
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #7  
98LS1's Avatar
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
Default RE: GT performance?

ORIGINAL: 03BlackSteed

If you have a good driver in the seat, my friend, you can get the GT to do 13.5 1/4. Doesn't happen very much but average is probably 13.9.

Holy **** you're misinformed. Since giving hard proven facts are typically not enough for this forum go find you a good 1/4 mile calculator using weight and hp. It's typically right on the money for most cars. The GT w/o a driver is only capable of 14.2....13.5 hahahahahaha
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 09:43 PM
  #8  
GSXRIntensity's Avatar
GSXRIntensity
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,205
From: Chi-town!!!
Default RE: GT performance?

ORIGINAL: 95LT1

ORIGINAL: 03BlackSteed

If you have a good driver in the seat, my friend, you can get the GT to do 13.5 1/4. Doesn't happen very much but average is probably 13.9.

Holy **** you're misinformed. Since giving hard proven facts are typically not enough for this forum go find you a good 1/4 mile calculator using weight and hp. It's typically right on the money for most cars. The GT w/o a driver is only capable of 14.2....13.5 hahahahahaha
F*CK a calculator. I have seen stock 99+ models run anywhere from low 14 to high 13's. 13.7 is a very common #, but so is 14.1, or 14.2.

What kind of LT1 do you have?
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #9  
98LS1's Avatar
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
Default RE: GT performance?

a 95........... ........

F*CK a calculator
Yes, damn those facts, damn them to hell.

I would like to see an actual time slip of anyone on this forum running below 14 with a stock GT. A BONE stock GT. It just doesn't happen around here. Must be the water.....
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 10:53 PM
  #10  
jeep45238's Avatar
jeep45238
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,199
From: United States
Default RE: GT performance?

Does that mean stock tires too?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.