4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

underrating the GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2006, 02:38 AM
  #1  
MustangGTftw
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
MustangGTftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 200
Default underrating the GT

Ya know, i was reading some of the older posts back in the 300-400 pages, and there are a lot of coparisons to the mach 1 and who would win in a race. All i read were people talking down on the GT saying its *** would get whooped, and so on and so on. I really think you have to give the GT alittle more credit then you are. My 2 cents
MustangGTftw is offline  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:42 AM
  #2  
03redGT
3rd Gear Member
 
03redGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 781
Default RE: underrating the GT

yeah we typically give the GT credit against all other cars slower than it. the MACH 1 however is a bit faster. not galaxies faster like the cobra, just a little bit. still its depressing.

>>>>probably has something to do with 32 valves and DOHC<<<<

and the shaker hood is good for at least 50 horses lol j/k only for you vvvvvvvv
03redGT is offline  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:44 AM
  #3  
djdalfaro
2nd Gear Member
 
djdalfaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 466
Default RE: underrating the GT

oh oh... I want 50 horsies...
djdalfaro is offline  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:45 AM
  #4  
Quickshift_02GT
4th Gear Member
 
Quickshift_02GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,266
Default RE: underrating the GT

I love my faithful little Steed, I don't care what anyone says.

Until I can afford a Vette, this is good enough in my book.
Quickshift_02GT is offline  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:46 AM
  #5  
Dragon02GT
2nd Gear Member
 
Dragon02GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 487
Default RE: underrating the GT


ORIGINAL: Quickshift_02GT

I love my faithful little Steed, I don't care what anyone says.

Until I can afford a Vette, this is good enough in my book.
+1
Dragon02GT is offline  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:48 AM
  #6  
MustangGTftw
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
MustangGTftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 200
Default RE: underrating the GT

lol, you basterds, you were supposed to post comments like " i completly agree, blah blah blah blah", o well, lol
MustangGTftw is offline  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:48 AM
  #7  
03redGT
3rd Gear Member
 
03redGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 781
Default RE: underrating the GT

yes i agree without the slightest bit of doubt....

better?
03redGT is offline  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:53 AM
  #8  
djdalfaro
2nd Gear Member
 
djdalfaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 466
Default RE: underrating the GT

oh me too... absolutly no doubt...
djdalfaro is offline  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:53 AM
  #9  
SXGT
5th Gear Member
 
SXGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,023
Default RE: underrating the GT

Mach 1 - Better MPG , Better Looks , harder to work on engine , more power , different chassis? , better suspension? i see nothing the GT has better. Close yes but Mach has the edge.
SXGT is offline  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:55 AM
  #10  
Quickshift_02GT
4th Gear Member
 
Quickshift_02GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,266
Default RE: underrating the GT

Better gas mileage and harder to work on engine?

Huh? [&:]
Quickshift_02GT is offline  


Quick Reply: underrating the GT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.