4.6 vs 5.0
#15
RE: 4.6 vs 5.0
Ya, I know the 4v responds so well to boost. But you and I both know that the car with more displacement can be made to go faster, that's all I'm saying.
It'd be like taking the ZR-1 and adding boost to it and taking a Cobra with it's already boosted motor. The ZR-1 would own it b/c of displacement, and of course weight.
It'd be like taking the ZR-1 and adding boost to it and taking a Cobra with it's already boosted motor. The ZR-1 would own it b/c of displacement, and of course weight.
#17
RE: 4.6 vs 5.0
I'm guessing that's not stock displacement? Besides, if the 4.6 can make that much then the 350 could make more. No sense in arguing this. I see your point, I think you see mine. No replacement for displacement. We learned this many years ago.
#18
RE: 4.6 vs 5.0
no, stock displacement...and about no replacement for displacement...thats a saying of the past, there are so many other factors...if the ls1 was a 4 cam motor, it would OWN all...im just a fan of 4 cam motors from personal experience
#19
RE: 4.6 vs 5.0
I understand what you're saying. The ZR-1 is a 32 valve DOHC motor though. That's why I said it would make more power. The new Cobra = bad ***. I still have no idea why GM went back to pushrods after going with the DOHC motor. Cause you're right, DOHC LS1 > all.
#20
RE: 4.6 vs 5.0
ORIGINAL: 95LT1
I understand what you're saying. The ZR-1 is a 32 valve DOHC motor though. That's why I said it would make more power.
I understand what you're saying. The ZR-1 is a 32 valve DOHC motor though. That's why I said it would make more power.