4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2006, 03:44 AM
  #11  
Black Snake
5th Gear Member
 
Black Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,721
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs

5.0's and 4.6's are preatty even as far as performance goes, stock I mean. The fox bodys are lil lighter then the newer 4.6 stangs.

Plus the aftermarket is huge for 5.0's, also alot cheaper to mod. So it kinda rare to race a stock 5.0, most of the time they are modded.
Black Snake is offline  
Old 07-03-2006, 01:38 PM
  #12  
droptoppony
5th Gear Member
 
droptoppony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,489
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs


ORIGINAL: Black Snake

5.0's and 4.6's are preatty even as far as performance goes, stock I mean. The fox bodys are lil lighter then the newer 4.6 stangs.

Plus the aftermarket is huge for 5.0's, also alot cheaper to mod. So it kinda rare to race a stock 5.0, most of the time they are modded.
Haha you misunderstood the question

its not comparing the pushrod 5.0 to a modular 4.6...he wants to know what gains he will make by stroking a 4.6 to 5.0l or doing a big bore to a 4.6.
droptoppony is offline  
Old 07-03-2006, 03:51 PM
  #13  
Nadelle
3rd Gear Member
 
Nadelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 551
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs

Stroking the 4.6 will gain torqe, maybe 20-30 ft-lbs. Top end power will suffer, the engine will; feell like its running out of breath sooner if all things being the same that is.

Boring the 4.6 to 5.0 is the best way to gain cubic inches, but cost alot more than stroking, as you have to take apart the engine and insert new cylinder liners. The engine with a big bore will unshroud the valves. It will make more low end torqe AND top end power

The bore to stroke ration on a stroker 5.0 is more like a truck, but big bore small strokes always biuld good low end and top end.

I asked myself this question a while ago and used Engine Analyzer Pro V3.3 to see what would happen, of course the stroker makes good torqe but dousnt liek to rev, and the big bore makes good torqe and actually want to rev higher than the stock 4.6

You should also P&P the heads and get some new cams with at least 5 more degrees of duration.
Nadelle is offline  
Old 07-03-2006, 07:04 PM
  #14  
Black Snake
5th Gear Member
 
Black Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,721
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs

Ahh I under stand now, Didnt think you could bore a 289 over to a 302. My bad, But yea what they said you will gain a bunch of torque.

Black Snake is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 01:00 AM
  #15  
droptoppony
5th Gear Member
 
droptoppony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,489
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs


ORIGINAL: Black Snake

Ahh I under stand now, Didnt think you could bore a 289 over to a 302. My bad, But yea what they said you will gain a bunch of torque.

your giving us extra cubes...i like you
we actually have 281 cubic inches...pathetic huh! We should have all had the spray bore 5.0 modulars from the factory.
droptoppony is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 01:45 AM
  #16  
aking287
2nd Gear Member
 
aking287's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 168
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs

Why would you only stroke it to 5.0?? If I'm not mistaken a 5.4 is a stroked 4.6. Motor Trend article on the new 07 Shelby says that the 5.4 liter it has is just a stroked 4.6
aking287 is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 01:50 AM
  #17  
97 5.0L
3rd Gear Member
 
97 5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 569
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs

correct me if I am wrong but I believe to go to a 5.4 you need new heads.
97 5.0L is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 02:23 AM
  #18  
droptoppony
5th Gear Member
 
droptoppony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,489
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs

A 5.4 is a different block then a 4.6 its physically larger....Heads are interchangable hence the term modular.

droptoppony is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 03:02 AM
  #19  
97 5.0L
3rd Gear Member
 
97 5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 569
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs

I believe the 5.4 is built on the same block as the 4.6 it just has a longer stroke.
97 5.0L is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 03:11 AM
  #20  
97 5.0L
3rd Gear Member
 
97 5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 569
Default RE: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs

I FOUND THIS ON ANOTHER FORUM



F150online Forums > Powertrain (OEM) > Engines > Difference between 5.4 and 4.6 - Engine Stroke

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PDAView Full Version : Difference between 5.4 and 4.6 - Engine Stroke

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

kkirt109-19-1999, 10:47 PM
I was reading my owners manual (what F150 owner doesn't know it cover to cover) and noticed the specs for the 4.6 and 5.4. What jumped out at me was that the piston size is the same. The only bottom-end difference is the longer crank. Any engine bulders out there have comments on the affects of longer cranks in the seat of the pants test?

------------------
'97 F150 Lariat, Flareside, white/sliver, SC, ORP, 5.4, Mods: 305/70/16 GY ATS, AR Baja wheels, dual exhaust, Smittybilt Nerf Bars, Edelbrock IAS Shocks, K&N Filter and Carbon Fiber Bug Gaurd. Rigged the fog lights too.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

nomo09-20-1999, 12:20 AM
Generally, a longer stroke = more torque.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

vBulletin v3.5.3, Copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
97 5.0L is offline  


Quick Reply: 4.6 VS 5.0 Stangs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.