4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

1997

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2006, 02:49 AM
  #11  
Hash06
4th Gear Member
 
Hash06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,362
Default RE: 1997

i love my 97 but i wish i would have held out for a 99+ just my .02
Hash06 is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 12:46 PM
  #12  
bsteen81
3rd Gear Member
 
bsteen81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 834
Default RE: 1997

It looks good from the 2 pictures. Are you going to go look at it before you buy? Carfax it first and take it to a tech if you are unfamiliar with the car. Also, just so you know, these are among the slowest Mustang's ever made. Since you are paying such a low price I would suggest swapping the motor for a new '99 or higher motor. It will give you 40 more hp and a new motor for like 2-3K. Of course if you just want it to have a stang, it looks decent.
bsteen81 is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 02:12 PM
  #13  
98YellohCobra
1st Gear Member
 
98YellohCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 56
Default RE: 1997

Not bad for a 97.. My previous mustang was a 97 GT. the car had 130k miles on the original motor before it was destroyed by someone who ran a red light.

Check the service history (recall history). The only major issue I can think of with the '97, was that there were some issues with the plastic intake manifold cracking and causing an oil leak, but if they had all the service bulletin / recall work done that shouldn't be an issue...
98YellohCobra is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 04:13 PM
  #14  
chirp_5957
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
chirp_5957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 442
Default RE: 1997

what ones are slow...just 97 or from 96-98?

ORIGINAL: bsteen81

It looks good from the 2 pictures. Are you going to go look at it before you buy? Carfax it first and take it to a tech if you are unfamiliar with the car. Also, just so you know, these are among the slowest Mustang's ever made. Since you are paying such a low price I would suggest swapping the motor for a new '99 or higher motor. It will give you 40 more hp and a new motor for like 2-3K. Of course if you just want it to have a stang, it looks decent.
chirp_5957 is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 04:20 PM
  #15  
bsteen81
3rd Gear Member
 
bsteen81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 834
Default RE: 1997


ORIGINAL: chirp_5957

what ones are slow...just 97 or from 96-98?

ORIGINAL: bsteen81

It looks good from the 2 pictures. Are you going to go look at it before you buy? Carfax it first and take it to a tech if you are unfamiliar with the car. Also, just so you know, these are among the slowest Mustang's ever made. Since you are paying such a low price I would suggest swapping the motor for a new '99 or higher motor. It will give you 40 more hp and a new motor for like 2-3K. Of course if you just want it to have a stang, it looks decent.
'96-'98 are the bad ones. You can do a PI swap but its gonna cost just a little less than a new motor swap will. If you like the body style look for a '94-'95. They come with the 5.0L V8 and can produce more power.
bsteen81 is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 04:25 PM
  #16  
chirp_5957
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
chirp_5957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 442
Default RE: 1997

so hard to find a 94-95 around me thats in my price range tho...its annoying[:@]
chirp_5957 is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 04:32 PM
  #17  
bsteen81
3rd Gear Member
 
bsteen81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 834
Default RE: 1997


ORIGINAL: chirp_5957

so hard to find a 94-95 around me thats in my price range tho...its annoying[:@]
That was my problem too. Thats how I ended up with a 98 instead and just swapped the motor. Where are you located?
bsteen81 is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 04:40 PM
  #18  
beastzilla02
5th Gear Member
 
beastzilla02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,421
Default RE: 1997

97 mustangs r not slow lol
beastzilla02 is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 04:43 PM
  #19  
chirp_5957
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
chirp_5957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 442
Default RE: 1997

im located in north east part of south dakota..my best hope to a 94-95 gt is a 4-5 hour drive to the twin cities [sm=lame.gif]
chirp_5957 is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 04:45 PM
  #20  
timmyisevil
2nd Gear Member
 
timmyisevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 168
Default RE: 1997

check the numbers the 94-95 ARE the lowest hp rated GT since like 79 i have a 98gt and with a few mods the 5.0 cant even pull on me so get the 97 and swap the heads LS-1 Killer after that(and other mods of course)
timmyisevil is offline  


Quick Reply: 1997



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.