4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2004, 01:22 PM
  #1  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6



This is a DIRECT before and after on a mildly modded GT. The thread is on another forum. The guy claims he dyno'd his car, installed longtubes and re-dyno'd his car after. Now I've been claiming 20-25 rwhp from longtubes on a stock to mildly modded stang, and constantly get people claiming that they don't add much at all. So far those people (you know who you are) haven't provided proof of their claims yet - just spitting out unverifiable #'s.

Tell me what you think. This is 22 rwhp with NO loss in power below 2500 rpm.
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 06-23-2004, 01:48 PM
  #2  
Craziness4fun
2nd Gear Member
 
Craziness4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 157
Default RE: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

Where's that from... or what mods did the guy have?
Craziness4fun is offline  
Old 06-23-2004, 01:50 PM
  #3  
Monty
2nd Gear Member
 
Monty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 335
Default RE: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

WHY did i get an auto[sm=smiley19.gif]
Monty is offline  
Old 06-23-2004, 02:10 PM
  #4  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

ORIGINAL: Craziness4fun

Where's that from... or what mods did the guy have?
Sorry I thought I linked this. Its from stangnet. I found it lookin for proof as per a non-believer's request.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=474507
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 06-23-2004, 03:26 PM
  #5  
AirForce2004
2nd Gear Member
 
AirForce2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 153
Default RE: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

Wow did you read that whole post? There are some really..... stubborn people on there. Even after the guy with proof showed his dyno run the other guy kept arguing. Just thought that was funny. He would rather follow his "SOTP" gauge than a dyno o.0 wierd little boy.
AirForce2004 is offline  
Old 06-23-2004, 03:29 PM
  #6  
AirForce2004
2nd Gear Member
 
AirForce2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 153
Default RE: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

BTW the june issue of MM&FF shows a dyno run with long tubes. There was a significant INCREASE of torque and power. June and July issues are full of 4.6 2v upgrades with dynos attached to each.
AirForce2004 is offline  
Old 06-23-2004, 03:41 PM
  #7  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

Well every time I post about how much of a gain longtubes add, I get a few people agrueing that they aren't worth the trouble or that their 450 hp supercharged car only picked up 20 hp and its not worth it and blah blah blah.
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 06-23-2004, 03:49 PM
  #8  
AirForce2004
2nd Gear Member
 
AirForce2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 153
Default RE: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

20hp is always worth the trouble. Its what Mustang owners do... they try to queeze out every ounce of power/torque they can out of their engine. Fact of the matter is Ive done ALOT of research on headers because Im trying to decide what to go with and I keep running across the phrase "...4.6 2v stock headers are TOO restrictive." I know MM&FF arent the mustang Gods but I believe them enough when they say the stock headers actualy starve the engine of hp.

I did read an article from somewhere that says lt can add up to 45hp at the flywheel on the 99+ GTs... dont know about that one.
AirForce2004 is offline  
Old 06-23-2004, 04:17 PM
  #9  
callmecobra
5th Gear Member
 
callmecobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,883
Default RE: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

obviosly long tubes are the best, but bs on 20rwhp on a midly modded 2v. i picked up 20rwhp on a blown 4v....
callmecobra is offline  
Old 06-23-2004, 04:25 PM
  #10  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6

you were the person I was referring too []

theirs lots of factors, like weather, plug condidtion, etc. that can have an effect on the gains you see from any mod, even your tuning. maybe your car, nomo, was a freak of nature - maybe you dyno'd with different bar pressure, humidity, temp, etc. than before - who knows.

you got a dyno graph to show your gains?

***edit*** add another one *** this person here claims 23 rwhp when he went from an off-road h-pipe to longtubes and a matching x-pipe.
mdvaldosta is offline  


Quick Reply: This is for all those who think LT's don't produce 20+ rwhp on a 4.6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.