4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

S2000??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2004, 09:12 AM
  #11  
WHT00GT
3rd Gear Member
 
WHT00GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 12.59@107mph
Posts: 592
Default RE: S2000??

every s2000 i saw at the track was broke d%^k. the three i have seen, all broke their rear ends.
WHT00GT is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 02:22 PM
  #12  
newcrazycar
Thread Starter
 
newcrazycar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 21
Default RE: S2000??

thanks for the replys people. I think the s2000 electronically limits between 147-150mph from the sites i have been on, but i guess ive heard they are terrible until they get moving. So terrible they cant break the wheels at launch, maybe the new 2.2 can but im not to sure. Anyways i can be happy to say I love the stang
newcrazycar is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 05:05 PM
  #13  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: S2000??

ORIGINAL: WHT00GT

every s2000 i saw at the track was broke d%^k. the three i have seen, all broke their rear ends.
Modified, of course. first thing you're going to blow up with high rpm launches is going to be the clutch and tires.
 
Old 07-21-2004, 05:53 PM
  #14  
madhatch
 
madhatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Default RE: S2000??

the s2k and all honda's are limited to 147 mph ( even chipped ones) I have a hatchback with an integra type r motor 210- 225 hp and 160 or so ftlbs. It runs high 13's stock. S2k stock runs about 14.7 with better gears usually about 14.2 and the best n/a ones usually a little quicker than me. they have bad rears (they are built for handling not dragstrip) My pops just got a new 2003 showroom floor convertable last month. He wants it to be faster than me, I run 8.8 in the 8th @ 86 mph. He is looking at chips ect what do ya think he should start at?
madhatch is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 05:54 PM
  #15  
callmecobra
5th Gear Member
 
callmecobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,883
Default RE: S2000??

2003 convertible what?
callmecobra is offline  
Old 07-22-2004, 09:29 AM
  #16  
WHT00GT
3rd Gear Member
 
WHT00GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 12.59@107mph
Posts: 592
Default RE: S2000??

ORIGINAL: 2000Si

ORIGINAL: WHT00GT

every s2000 i saw at the track was broke d%^k. the three i have seen, all broke their rear ends.
Modified, of course. first thing you're going to blow up with high rpm launches is going to be the clutch and tires.
the funny part was they didn't even make it to the line... don't ask me why they were doing burnouts, but two of them broke doing a burnout...
WHT00GT is offline  
Old 07-22-2004, 01:28 PM
  #17  
Miliock
3rd Gear Member
 
Miliock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 770
Default RE: S2000??

tell your dad to supercharge the s2000.....thats makes if a freaking awesome car!!!!!!!! The torque of the line makes all the difference.
Miliock is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 01:29 PM
  #18  
madhatch
 
madhatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Default RE: S2000??

I think somebody is exagerating a little ( they broke before they even got to race) ( ricer)
my pops purchased a 2003 gt " premium" ? he is looking for a chip and maybe an exhaust
madhatch is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 08:19 PM
  #19  
Js281GT
2nd Gear Member
 
Js281GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 351
Default RE: S2000??

"WHAT" (as Rick James would say) are you talkin about?
Js281GT is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 08:27 PM
  #20  
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 8,635
Default RE: S2000??

ORIGINAL: 2000Si

160 mph wouldn't surprise me really... 9000 rpms and a 6 sp will let you do that....
Haha, this brings me back. I actually had a guy argue with me when I had my LT1 about how my car was so slow b/c I could only rev it so high....I was like, yes, it sucks making all my power at 3k rpms....anways, carry on.
98LS1 is offline  


Quick Reply: S2000??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 PM.