4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2004, 08:02 PM
  #1  
scott231us
Thread Starter
 
scott231us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8
Default Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

The only mod I have done to my 2003 Mustang GT is a cold air intake mod. I'm thinking about starting simple right now, and start with partially replacing the exhaust. I've heard the Cat Back provides the most HP and Sound improvement for the buck..


My question is, what are the differences (as far as sound and HP/Torque) between the Magnaflow and MAC 4.6L SOHC Cat Back exhaust systems? Does one make the engine sound better or louder than the other? What about any HP/Torque differences?
scott231us is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 08:09 PM
  #2  
Js281GT
2nd Gear Member
 
Js281GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 351
Default RE: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

It's actually 1.203333 hp over the mac. No I don't know. But magnaflow is better. (I think) If I were you though, I would buy a mac pro-chamber. Best sound.hp, torque on a naturally aspirated mustang.
Js281GT is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 08:35 PM
  #3  
USAMuscle
4th Gear Member
 
USAMuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,404
Default RE: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

Magnaflow makes a few more horses than MAC because they are straight-thru mufflers, but IMO chambered mufflers like MAC and Flowmasters sound the best on Mustangs. If you want the best sound, get a MAC cat-back or Flowmasters and an off-road H-pipe. If you're going to get mufflers, do yourself a favor and get an off-road H-pipe or X-pipe. The cats are really restrictive, and getting rid of them will really open up your exhaust note.
USAMuscle is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 08:48 PM
  #4  
scott231us
Thread Starter
 
scott231us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8
Default RE: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

and getting rid of them will really open up your
USA Muscle, making it sound really good is more important to me, than the extra 2 hp (if that's all I will be losing if I go with the MAC..).


Will the MAC Cat back still offer more HP than my factory cat back system? If so, approx how much will I still gain? How much would I gain if I did decide to use the Magnaflow? Which one is louder, the Magnaflow or the MAC? How much better does the MAC sound (is it considerably better in sound)? Will the magnaflow sound better than the stock, although it doesn't sound as good as the MAC?
scott231us is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 09:21 PM
  #5  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

Im about to ditch my magnaflows for some flowmaster 40's - don't shoot me - but I think I don't mind givin up 5hp for the better sound.
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 09:51 PM
  #6  
Js281GT
2nd Gear Member
 
Js281GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 351
Default RE: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

Honestly MD, The flows with the pro-chamber is the best sound. Must be even better with your longtubes. (Mine sounds like a nascar)
Js281GT is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 09:56 PM
  #7  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

Anyone wanna buy some Magnaflows less than 6 months old?
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 10:08 PM
  #8  
Js281GT
2nd Gear Member
 
Js281GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 351
Default RE: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

I will find someone MD. What size tips? Does it come with the longtubes? lol
Js281GT is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 10:19 PM
  #9  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

Hehe lol. The tips are 3.5" I think, I may just get some 40's and weld them in and sell the magnaflow mufflers if I don't get a descent offer on the cat-back. I paid $370.00 for them new.
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 11:09 PM
  #10  
OUZBnd
3rd Gear Member
 
OUZBnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 920
Default RE: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs

md: are they magnapacks? if so im extremely interested
OUZBnd is offline  


Quick Reply: Magnaflow versus MAC 4.6L Cat Backs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.