4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Sub-Frame Connector Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2006, 02:53 AM
  #1  
hammerdown99
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
hammerdown99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 284
Default Sub-Frame Connector Question

Hey guys, im looking to buy some sub-frame connectors for my mustang and I just wanted some second opinions before I bought anything. There are several different ones, like steeda and such but there are some on ebay that seem nice. Im not really one to go the cheap way out on my stang but I was thinking how much different they were and that the ones from ebay would be the same. Should I buy the steeda ones or go ahead and get the ones off of ebay? Blue Oval Industries is the dealer for them. Thanks for any advice.
hammerdown99 is offline  
Old 12-05-2006, 05:17 AM
  #2  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: Sub-Frame Connector Question

I got the blue oval industries ones.

They are fine build quailty, but they were a BIT of a PITA to install.

The steeda ones look like (from the pics anyway) they are prebent. What you have to do with the BOI ones is weld the back on, put the nuts on the bolts that are sticking out of the bottom of the car, tighten them, and then use a jack to press the front of the connector to the front frame of the car, and then weld them.

its not that big of a deal, the just don't come with enough prebend to fit without a small amount of massaging. Other than that, unless you are looking at adjustable ones there is no difference.

I am happy with mine. The car feels much stiffer and doesn't want to pull just one corner up nearly as much as it used to.
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 12-05-2006, 09:20 AM
  #3  
Chopper
5th Gear Member
 
Chopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 2,028
Default RE: Sub-Frame Connector Question


ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

I got the blue oval industries ones.

They are fine build quailty, but they were a BIT of a PITA to install.

The steeda ones look like (from the pics anyway) they are prebent. What you have to do with the BOI ones is weld the back on, put the nuts on the bolts that are sticking out of the bottom of the car, tighten them, and then use a jack to press the front of the connector to the front frame of the car, and then weld them.

its not that big of a deal, the just don't come with enough prebend to fit without a small amount of massaging. Other than that, unless you are looking at adjustable ones there is no difference.
"Use a jack to press them into place"?????
I have the Steeda SFC's and chose them over MM's because there was less welding involved.They fit perfectly with NO bending.I would think that having to bend SFC's into position would pre-load the frame and could cause alignment problems.
I would get the pre-bent variety.
Chopper is offline  
Old 12-05-2006, 12:29 PM
  #4  
hammerdown99
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
hammerdown99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 284
Default RE: Sub-Frame Connector Question

Hmmm, so how do I konw which ones are pre-bent or not? They kinda all look the same to me
hammerdown99 is offline  
Old 12-05-2006, 01:16 PM
  #5  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: Sub-Frame Connector Question


ORIGINAL: Chopper


ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

I got the blue oval industries ones.

They are fine build quailty, but they were a BIT of a PITA to install.

The steeda ones look like (from the pics anyway) they are prebent. What you have to do with the BOI ones is weld the back on, put the nuts on the bolts that are sticking out of the bottom of the car, tighten them, and then use a jack to press the front of the connector to the front frame of the car, and then weld them.

its not that big of a deal, the just don't come with enough prebend to fit without a small amount of massaging. Other than that, unless you are looking at adjustable ones there is no difference.
"Use a jack to press them into place"?????
I have the Steeda SFC's and chose them over MM's because there was less welding involved.They fit perfectly with NO bending.I would think that having to bend SFC's into position would pre-load the frame and could cause alignment problems.
I would get the pre-bent variety.
It doesn't load the frame signifcantly enough to do anything. At least I have not had any problems, and I can definatly tell a difference between before and after. The car does not twist as much and the small creak I had under hard accleration is gone.

I did it with the suspension loaded, and there just isn't any way that a 1.5" or whatever the size is square tube is gonna bend or flex the frame.

You will not have any performance problems with the non pre bent ones is what I am saying.
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
10-16-2015 08:13 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
3
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 10:29 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM



Quick Reply: Sub-Frame Connector Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.