Dodge Charger R/T vs. 2004 Mustang GT
#11
RE: Dodge Charger R/T vs. 2004 Mustang GT
ORIGINAL: BigBadRick
Well bad news for me. My sister just picked up a new Charger r/t. Now my car is no longer the badass in the family. What would I need to keep up with one of these? My car is a 5spd. That helps a little.
Well bad news for me. My sister just picked up a new Charger r/t. Now my car is no longer the badass in the family. What would I need to keep up with one of these? My car is a 5spd. That helps a little.
#14
RE: Dodge Charger R/T vs. 2004 Mustang GT
ORIGINAL: blueherd02gt
These ghetto sleds aren't fast, all hemi means is hemispherical nothing special really.
These ghetto sleds aren't fast, all hemi means is hemispherical nothing special really.
#16
RE: Dodge Charger R/T vs. 2004 Mustang GT
ORIGINAL: sprostang
Dude!! Please tell me that pic of that car in your sig IS NOT yours. [&:]
ORIGINAL: NORMAN99
U might have to put a few bolt-ons and you'll take the win..........
U might have to put a few bolt-ons and you'll take the win..........
well...
#17
RE: Dodge Charger R/T vs. 2004 Mustang GT
I lined up against one the last time I was at the track and beat him no problem. Even on my 2.306 60' time I ended up beating him by .7317 seconds. The R/T's are just too heavy for the motor.
#18
RE: Dodge Charger R/T vs. 2004 Mustang GT
ORIGINAL: SINISTER
I lined up against one the last time I was at the track and beat him no problem. Even on my 2.306 60' time I ended up beating him by .7317 seconds. The R/T's are just too heavy for the motor.
I lined up against one the last time I was at the track and beat him no problem. Even on my 2.306 60' time I ended up beating him by .7317 seconds. The R/T's are just too heavy for the motor.
[sm=exactly.gif]