Nitti00GT

I'd take a 96-98 Cobra over my GT any day. Then again my GT needs a paintjob

silverstang1996

so you consider a 15 second car EXTREMELY slow. so then i take it you're pretty much saying a stock 99+ SN95 is just slow since it's only a .7-1 second faster in most cases? nice to know your place about mustangs.

06musgt

14 sec wasn't a bad time at the time,after 2000,technlogy boomed and became alot quicker,who would think all these 4are doing what they are doing today,you dont know who has a turbo or what.

jkm1987

they arent that fast but they are terribly slow either my friend had a 98gt 5spd with xpipe,flows, cia, u/d pullies, and 3.55's and ran a 9.3 1/8th mile which is about a 14.3 or so (correct me if im wrong). That is about as fast a stock 99-04. Another friend of mine has an auto 94 gt w/the 5.0 its stock minus h-pipe and ive drove it alot it feels pretty strong id say high 14's. so no they arent that too terribly slow.

Gar4pt6

umm ya i think thats what hes sayin...lol the edge mustangs ARE slow...

Adam03GT

Ummm did you take a look at my sig you punk? Well if not you should check it!

Adam03GT

And yes 1 second is a HUGE difference..... So your not making a very good point.

98MustangSTL

Mustangs are slow, in my opinion. I don't even think a car is worth talking about unless it's in the 13's, maybe the 12's. It's just my opinion. I enjoy mustangs, very fun cars, but just not fast enough. I drive an sn-95 and I know how it is to loose day in and day out to a lot faster cars. O well. Haha.

jt01gt

are mach 1s 4v ??
[align=left] [/align]

Hash06

yes

and the slowest i have ever run was a 14.8 with the gears i ran a 14.3+ the driver mod