HEADER Q
#3
RE: HEADER Q
The install is pretty damn difficult so i hear, so unless you're used to doing alot of engine work i would take it somewhere. The install is going to cost you alot too. You're also going to need a shorty mid-pipe to get the LT's put on.
#4
RE: HEADER Q
the install isn't that hard.. its just a pain in the ***. get two buddies to help with the install and read through this. http://fnsweet.com/garage/ltinstall.shtml <-hey, maybe this should be stickied(hint hint mods)
#6
RE: HEADER Q
I dont want to steal the tread but I see that Hooker Headers are probably one of the higher quality type headers and they arent that much more expenisve than BBK and less than Bassani , why is it that not many people have them?
#7
RE: HEADER Q
i think its cauz people are scared to go outside the box when they think lt's, the know people always have mac and bbk, possibly slp or kooks but no1 really thinks of the old school headers (or at least brand thats been around for a while) like hooker
#8
RE: HEADER Q
ORIGINAL: MustangGT99
i think its cauz people are scared to go outside the box when they think lt's, the know people always have mac and bbk, possibly slp or kooks but no1 really thinks of the old school headers (or at least brand thats been around for a while) like hooker
i think its cauz people are scared to go outside the box when they think lt's, the know people always have mac and bbk, possibly slp or kooks but no1 really thinks of the old school headers (or at least brand thats been around for a while) like hooker
You cannot use your stock H with LTs.
#9
RE: HEADER Q
Oh ok I was just wondering because im looking at getting some ceraminc Hooker headers and since no one has them I thought there was a reason, maybe poor quaility or something. But thats not the problem right
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
trashxtrash
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
4
09-20-2015 10:49 PM