K&N vs. Tunable Induction
#11
RE: K&N vs. Tunable Induction
ORIGINAL: Acer2428
I'd have to see the dyno before I believed it....
Maybe on a 4ver, DEF on a FI car...
but on a near stock 2v?
I'd have to see the dyno before I believed it....
Maybe on a 4ver, DEF on a FI car...
but on a near stock 2v?
You'd be real lucky to see 5.
#13
RE: K&N vs. Tunable Induction
man some you guys have more $$$ than sense......those cai ARE over priced and offer lil gains..spend the $$$ on gears are something else like sticky tires.... k/n always says up to 15 hp.....that damn "up to" BS...
#14
RE: K&N vs. Tunable Induction
i got the FIPK en II for 160 off of Ebay brand new. it definitely ain't 15 hp to even the crank. but its still a good intake either way you'll be happy i guess but i would get something else first like gears if you wanna feel power.
#15
RE: K&N vs. Tunable Induction
just go for the densecharger w the pro m... idk bout the rest of you but i deff felt a difference... actually a significant difference with the full length densecharger w the pro m
#17
RE: K&N vs. Tunable Induction
ORIGINAL: code3GT
Don't waste your $$. If all you have is a CAI for mods, the MAF is fine. Everyone is gonna get all over this post, but unless you are really putting some HP down, your stock MAF is fine. My car is around 360 RWHP and 480 RWTQ and I still have my stock MAF. Ford does an okay job on their air/fuel electronics, so just leave it for now.
Don't waste your $$. If all you have is a CAI for mods, the MAF is fine. Everyone is gonna get all over this post, but unless you are really putting some HP down, your stock MAF is fine. My car is around 360 RWHP and 480 RWTQ and I still have my stock MAF. Ford does an okay job on their air/fuel electronics, so just leave it for now.
#20
RE: K&N vs. Tunable Induction
ORIGINAL: 2k1gt
Yes, the tubable induction system is a very good sytem. I have one and love it.
Yes, the tubable induction system is a very good sytem. I have one and love it.