2000GT4.6

Woah, hold on a second here. Are you saying you are making 350 Rear Wheel horsepower with the above mods?????

GTron

Most dynosheets that i've seen from a Mustang Dyno always seem lower.

Is it just me? or has anyone else noticed that?

O, yea and I'm gonna have to call BS on 350hp with Exhaust, cams, and CAI.

GSXRIntensity

Bullsh*t. You're not making 350rwhp with just your listed mods. You won't gain sh*t with a shift kit (seeing as you're an auto...you're low in rwhp to begin with). A CAI is good for 2-5ponies (should gotten a C&L or Densecharger), Can't tell about your exhaust cuz you didn't list what brand(s) you have & how much exhaust work you've done, but either way, no more than 20rwhp from that. Stage 2 Cams & stage 2 heads will net you approx 60rwhp, & you said nothing of headwork, so there is NO WAY your car is making 350rwhp. 350 crank hp...I'll buy that, but stop w/the b.s.

code3GT

Mustang dyno #'s are usually about 20% less than dyno jet.

Vizaracer

yea, i like getting dyno's on dyno jets.

i dynoed my truck on a mustang dyno and i had 215 hp. i dynoed it on a dynojet and i cranked out 267 hp at the wheels. stupid automatic on my truck takes alot of power away. also [sm=sigh.gif]

Dan04COBRA

Good call on the Mustang Dyno's, I never even noticed that. So I retract my statement!!

Red 5

So are you saying:

Mustang dyno: 247

Dynojet: 247x .20= 49.4+247=296.4

2001_SaleenS281_08

that seems awful high now.....

Red 5

Damn I thought it sounded too good to be true.

UT04GT

if the 20% is measured from dynojet numbers then 247 / .8 = 308.75 rwhp which seems really off

Remember that all dynos read differently, some read higher and some read lower