4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

DYNO SAYS......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:24 PM
  #31  
grabbem88's Avatar
grabbem88
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,872
From: cape giradeau,mo
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......

soooooooooooo............who want's to race?
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #32  
RedStangGT2000's Avatar
RedStangGT2000
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 312
From: OHIO, WISCONSIN
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......

I'm Game
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:30 PM
  #33  
Red 5's Avatar
Red 5
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 268
From: OK
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......

ORIGINAL: 98LS1

I've been told that you can program a Mustang dyno to dyno actual road conditions or just to measure the hp. More than likely, yours was set to just measure the hp, much like a dynojet. Still pretty decent numbers.
They told me it was calibrated to take into effect the weight of the car and so forth. They said it would be lower than a dynojet. They said a stock GT would post around 215 on thier machine.
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:32 PM
  #34  
grabbem88's Avatar
grabbem88
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,872
From: cape giradeau,mo
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......

well game on then.
ORIGINAL: RedStangGT2000

I'm Game
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:33 PM
  #35  
98LS1's Avatar
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......


ORIGINAL: Red 5

ORIGINAL: 98LS1

I've been told that you can program a Mustang dyno to dyno actual road conditions or just to measure the hp. More than likely, yours was set to just measure the hp, much like a dynojet. Still pretty decent numbers.
They told me it was calibrated to take into effect the weight of the car and so forth. They said it would be lower than a dynojet. They said a stock GT would post around 215 on thier machine.
Well, in that case sounds like you have a hell of a freak my friend. I think MD and JD only put down a little over 270rwhp with full bolt ons.
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #36  
Dan04COBRA's Avatar
Dan04COBRA
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 14,917
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......


ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
It is competely impossible to be making 350 RWHP with your listed mods. You dont even have anything done to your intake side according to your cardomain pictures.

350 RWHP requires headwork and an intake manifold. You would know if you had either of these done.

Full boltons is usually good for about 275 RWHP. I can see 300 RWHP with cams and a super good tune (as well as a factory freak to start with), but just barely 300 RWHP.

I reference this with what is reported to be the fastest N/A 2v car on the planet :

http://forums.modulardepot.com/flyshow.php?&showid=150

BTW you might be able to pull that 11.96 bs on cardomain, but it isnt gonna happen here. MD ran an 11.96 on cammed/blower car making 425 at the wheels, and that was with drag radials and control arms.
I'm with ya 100% on this one, I'm pretty sure the whole forum is too.
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:46 PM
  #37  
Red 5's Avatar
Red 5
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 268
From: OK
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......


ORIGINAL: 98LS1

Well, in that case sounds like you have a hell of a freak my friend. I think MD and JD only put down a little over 270rwhp with full bolt ons.
Well I wish I knew for sure but they are the only dyno place around. I'll wait to see what JD and MD have to say about it.

Oh yeah, RedStangGT2000 & grabbem88 should start thier own Pi$$in match post.
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #38  
98LS1's Avatar
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,635
From: North Cackilacky
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......

I can **** farther than anyone in all teh land!!!10n3

[8D]
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:48 PM
  #39  
Fat Nick's Avatar
Fat Nick
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 812
From: Virginia
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......

Your #'s seem about right on to me. Nice torque. 215 is about right for a stock auto GT, although 5spd. are generally 230's. Your a 5spd. car I'm assuming.
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #40  
2000GT4.6's Avatar
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,575
From: United States
Default RE: DYNO SAYS......


ORIGINAL: RedStangGT2000

YOUR WRONG I have told you what i've done and yes 350 HP so fug off.
Once I add Nitrous who knows[]
Ok then, I guess im making on the upwards of 400 RWHP since i have much more done?

ROFL.

As I said, that BS might walk on car domain, it isnt gonna walk here. We know what a mustang will and will not make. I can give you facutal sources all day long if you want.

BTW i like how you said about swapping cams again "They didn't mess up I just went a little bigger". There isnt anywhere to go with a 4.6. Virtually all of the camshafts that will work with a stock motor/cams are identical. The only choice is wiether you want to do valvesprings or not. No set of stock engine cams are going to make more than 5-8 more RWHP than another set. The major differences only happen with high RPM setups, and setups with head/intake work. At that point you start to trade down low torque for top end HP.

As I said, dont bull**** on here. The people on here have acutally done the things you are talking about. I am frequently in Quincy, IL btw, if you wanna drive there sometime in the spring/summer



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.