4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Tb and plenum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2007, 04:31 PM
  #1  
Bossy
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 219
Default Tb and plenum

I just ordered a 70mm profressional pruducts throttlebody and plenum for my 96 gt. This will work with stock MAF right? Pretty sure it will but would just like to know for sure.
Bossy is offline  
Old 11-16-2007, 04:34 PM
  #2  
sstang
5th Gear Member
 
sstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 2,663
Default RE: Tb and plenum

It will work fine. If it's possible though, I highly recommend changing it for a 75mm TB. They are the same price and are worth a couple hp over the 70mm even on stock applications.
sstang is offline  
Old 11-16-2007, 04:41 PM
  #3  
Bossy
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 219
Default RE: Tb and plenum

the guy at brothers performance said to use 70 cuz 75 would cost me some lowend torgue. I got a steal on a 3in catback so I used it and it raped my lowend. Even with the 4:10 geares it wont spin the tires. The last thing I want to do is lose more lowend. However the car has crazy high rpm hp with the 3in catback. You can really feel the diference high rpm. Dont know if the guy from brothers was right or not. I was gonna get the 75 but he talked me into the 70.
Bossy is offline  
Old 11-16-2007, 05:03 PM
  #4  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default RE: Tb and plenum

He's right. In a n/a setup, at or near WOT, the charge velocity drops off at lower (2000 to 3500 rpm) engine speedswitha 75mm TB. This isgenerally known among competent tuners, but flies in the face of the usual "bigger is better" conventional wisdom.[/align][/align]Accufab's flow data (click here. 1/2 way down the page) shows that the 75 mm TB addslittle to nothing, even with their very capable plenum...[/align]
cliffyk is offline  
Old 11-16-2007, 05:20 PM
  #5  
klfutrelle
4th Gear Member
 
klfutrelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,124
Default RE: Tb and plenum

On a N/A it doesn't matter but if you plan on going the F/I route I would go ahead and get the 75mm. In this case the "bigger is better" does apply here.
klfutrelle is offline  
Old 11-16-2007, 06:07 PM
  #6  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default RE: Tb and plenum

ORIGINAL: klfutrelle

On a N/A it doesn't matter but if you plan on going the F/I route I would go ahead and get the 75mm. In this case the "bigger is better" does apply here.
[/align][/align]F/I is going to cost $3500 to $6000+, get the 70 now and get a 75 if and when you go F/I--it will raise the cost of your forced induction package by a whopping $125[/align]
cliffyk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonnyBlazeGT
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
3
11-03-2015 01:10 AM
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
3
09-18-2015 12:27 PM
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
7
08-29-2015 06:30 PM
Gary Ugarek
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
8
08-26-2015 08:41 AM
MusBBad95
New Member Area
7
08-17-2015 09:39 PM



Quick Reply: Tb and plenum



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 PM.