4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

87,91,93 tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2008, 09:39 AM
  #1  
Mustang 03 GT
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Mustang 03 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 148
Default 87,91,93 tune

I just purchased a SCT tuner from Brenpeed. The question that I have is there a big differnce from getting a 91 or 93 octane tune. I am living in Fort Leonard Wood Mo and cannot find a gas station that sells 93 octane fuel.
Mustang 03 GT is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 10:21 AM
  #2  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: 87,91,93 tune

with your mods your not going to see much difference between the two. Regardless, you have no choice.... install the 91 tune and then run 91 octane fuel.
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 01:09 PM
  #3  
dennis_112
3rd Gear Member
 
dennis_112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jackson, Oh
Posts: 897
Default RE: 87,91,93 tune

Ourengines are designed (compression ratio) and the PCM (engine computer) are programmed to adjust the spark firing angle for a certain range of fuel octane. The engine has what is called a predetonation sensor to signal the computer to advance the timing or retard the timing to correct for preignition (known as knocking or pinging)..But it has a limited range from retard to advance. So the fuel has to be of the correct octane for the timing to fall within this range. If you use a slower burning HIGH octane fuel, the spark control must adjust itself to it's full Advanced end of the spectrum...But it will not go far enough to compensate for the High octane fuel (usual above 90 or more)..What ends up happening is that, since the fuel burns slower and incompletely, a lot of left over unburned fuel remains and carbons up the combustion chambers. Resulting in higher compression eventually and then you are force to use the higher octane fuel by fault...So the faster burning 87 octane is optimum for proper combustion efficiency as these engines are set up for. Using any higher octane is a waste of money too...89 octane is a blend of the 87 and the 92+ at the pump's mixing valve. I would suggest you should havehad4.10 gears installed. You would have had a lot more fun, and enjoyed your purchase more. I use 92 in my car though. It is setup for it(dyno tuned), andI amrunning boostso its a must to prevent detonation.
dennis_112 is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 10:56 PM
  #4  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: 87,91,93 tune

ORIGINAL: dennis_112

Ourengines are designed (compression ratio) and the PCM (engine computer) are programmed to adjust the spark firing angle for a certain range of fuel octane. The engine has what is called a predetonation sensor to signal the computer to advance the timing or retard the timing to correct for preignition (known as knocking or pinging)..But it has a limited range from retard to advance. So the fuel has to be of the correct octane for the timing to fall within this range. If you use a slower burning HIGH octane fuel, the spark control must adjust itself to it's full Advanced end of the spectrum...But it will not go far enough to compensate for the High octane fuel (usual above 90 or more)..What ends up happening is that, since the fuel burns slower and incompletely, a lot of left over unburned fuel remains and carbons up the combustion chambers. Resulting in higher compression eventually and then you are force to use the higher octane fuel by fault...So the faster burning 87 octane is optimum for proper combustion efficiency as these engines are set up for. Using any higher octane is a waste of money too...89 octane is a blend of the 87 and the 92+ at the pump's mixing valve. I would suggest you should havehad4.10 gears installed. You would have had a lot more fun, and enjoyed your purchase more. I use 92 in my car though. It is setup for it(dyno tuned), andI amrunning boostso its a must to prevent detonation.
The car will make more power on 93 or 91 octane if it is tuned for said fuel. What you are saying is basically correct for a stock ECU car, but when you switch to a higher octane tune, the tuner adds more timing. This takes advatnage of the higher octane fuel, and makes more power than a stock tune car with 87 octane.
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 05:17 PM
  #5  
dennis_112
3rd Gear Member
 
dennis_112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jackson, Oh
Posts: 897
Default RE: 87,91,93 tune

I understand that, butis he really willing to pay high fuel prices for such a low increase in HP. I understand running 93+ octane in a car with F/I, or HIGH compression. But for a stock to mild N/A car. Its not worth it. Most bolts on's the HP you net is so slow and/or out of the power band for a N/A car, you are better off saving up for a centri/turbo/heads+cams/etc. Thats what I was getting at with my post above.
dennis_112 is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 05:53 PM
  #6  
scfd524
2nd Gear Member
 
scfd524's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 220
Default RE: 87,91,93 tune

His post is a simple question that doesn't need debating. No you will not see much difference between the 2. If you're willing to pay for the fuel, which you must be if you're asking this question, then tune your ECU for 91 octane and run that. I noticed when I was in Toledo, OH and Detroit, MI last week that they sell 94 octane at the pump. But then again it's right by a Sunoco refinery.
scfd524 is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 06:01 PM
  #7  
dennis_112
3rd Gear Member
 
dennis_112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jackson, Oh
Posts: 897
Default RE: 87,91,93 tune

The difference with a tuner using a canned tune in HP is not worth it. I would recommend saving for the above mentioned parts.
dennis_112 is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 06:16 PM
  #8  
JayC
4th Gear Member
 
JayC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default RE: 87,91,93 tune

ORIGINAL: dennis_112

The engine has what is called a predetonation sensor to signal the computer to advance the timing or retard the timing to correct for preignition (known as knocking or pinging).
More of your bad tech. The 4.6 2-valve motor does NOT have any such sensor to determine knock or preignition. The rest of your post just talked in circles as well. It;s obvious you just make this **** up as you go along. Really dude you need to stick to longtube installs and leave the bad tech at home
JayC is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 06:43 PM
  #9  
dennis_112
3rd Gear Member
 
dennis_112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jackson, Oh
Posts: 897
Default RE: 87,91,93 tune

I was refering to the system that prevents detonation as a sensor. Since whats controls pre-detonation is sensor(s) i.e. MAF, o2 sensors. I think I was windy enough as it stands.
dennis_112 is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 06:51 PM
  #10  
JayC
4th Gear Member
 
JayC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default RE: 87,91,93 tune

ORIGINAL: dennis_112

I was refering to the system that prevents detonation as a sensor. Since whats controls pre-detonation is sensor(s) i.e. MAF, o2 sensors. I think I was windy enough as it stands.
No you weren't. Give it up....you just got busted in the Nitrous thread
JayC is offline  


Quick Reply: 87,91,93 tune



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM.