4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Which supercharger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 09:52 AM
  #31  
USMCrebel's Avatar
USMCrebel
Mach I Section Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,140
From: round abouts these parts
Default RE: Which supercharger?

go with a centri, just to save some money, and get the D1sc it can do the same boost as the P1sc, and max out at like 30-32psi. if you need any more F1 will get you there, but thats pushing your block to the edge.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #32  
chrismartintx's Avatar
chrismartintx
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 101
From: Bryan, TX
Default RE: Which supercharger?

one thing about the seprate oil issue... why does that matter? there are tons of turbo'd vehicle sharing oil without any issues.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #33  
Fobra's Avatar
Fobra
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,064
From:
Default RE: Which supercharger?

ORIGINAL: tbirdscwd

I will say its almost all about personal preference. I like that my engine oil is seperate from my SC oil. Thats just me. It takes a total of 10 minutes to take my procharger off, so I don't mind doing it every 5-6 thousand miles. As far as high HP applications and featured car not having self oiled blowers. That couldn't be farther from the truth. Think of every KB, Procharger, Whipple, and Eaton you've ever seen in a magazine. You might not see a lot of self contained centris, because the only company (until the recent release of Paxtons new design) Procharger is the only company that offers self oiling. I have seen plenty of P-1 and D-1 making gobs of power and have seen them in many Mags. What about the Livernois 700rwhp 3v on a procharger F-1 thats been featured like 20 f-in times.
Not really, Most d-1 and up apps are not self contained, I dont even think the f series are available in self contained. The self contained bit is a gimmick aimed and selling system to peopel who dont know better, plain and simple.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #34  
Fobra's Avatar
Fobra
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,064
From:
Default RE: Which supercharger?

and the twin screw analogy doesnt hold water either
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #35  
nanaki's Avatar
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: Which supercharger?

ORIGINAL: USMCrebel

go with a centri, just to save some money, and get the D1sc it can do the same boost as the P1sc, and max out at like 30-32psi. if you need any more F1 will get you there, but thats pushing your block to the edge.
heh.. good luck maxing any of those units out on their maximum rated boost. my S trim was running 16psi and by bout 5500rpm, it fell flat on it's face. you can only run so much boost before it's not even efficient anymore.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 11:21 AM
  #36  
IanJK46conv's Avatar
IanJK46conv
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 234
From: New York
Default RE: Which supercharger?

Ok, back up, noob here. P-1, D-1, PS1C, (pi) heads? Sorry. Feel like a dumb### asking but what do they mean? I want some ponies out of my car, so I need to understand what you guys are talking bout. Also, "banned." Whats wrong with the self contained units? If they don't affect efficiency and reliablity, and you have the patience to add more time to oil changes, why not?
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #37  
tbirdscwd's Avatar
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,039
From: CA
Default RE: Which supercharger?

ORIGINAL: banned

and the twin screw analogy doesnt hold water either
Check out their website, (http://www.procharger.com/models.shtml) they're all self contained except for the P600, D-1, (not the D-1sc), and the D-1r. I believe the entire F-series is self contained. And how doesn't the twin screw "analogy" hold water. Are they not self contained, do you not see serious horsepower twin screws? Like around thousand on gt-500s.

And nanaki, I'm just wondering if anyone on here has actually Pushed a P-1sc or D-1sc to its limits. Your right, just because it says it can push 32 psi, doesn't mean ****. But what about the CFM. The P-1sc is supposed to flow an additional 200 CFM vs the S-trim
and the D-1sc an additional 400 CFM. That's an exta 40% at max efficiency on the D-1sc. I don't see how the numbers can be that far off.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #38  
nanaki's Avatar
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: Which supercharger?

ORIGINAL: tbirdscwd

ORIGINAL: banned

and the twin screw analogy doesnt hold water either
Check out their website, (http://www.procharger.com/models.shtml) they're all self contained except for the P600, D-1, (not the D-1sc), and the D-1r. I believe the entire F-series is self contained. And how doesn't the twin screw "analogy" hold water. Are they not self contained, do you not see serious horsepower twin screws? Like around thousand on gt-500s.

And nanaki, I'm just wondering if anyone on here has actually Pushed a P-1sc or D-1sc to its limits. Your right, just because it says it can push 32 psi, doesn't mean ****. But what about the CFM. The P-1sc is supposed to flow an additional 200 CFM vs the S-trim
and the D-1sc an additional 400 CFM. That's an exta 40% at max efficiency on the D-1sc. I don't see how the numbers can be that far off.
that's what i was getting at. peolpe don't pay attention to how much they flow, they just look at max boost. Z0MFG 32PSI FAST LOLZ! my T trim made about 50 more ponies at the same boost level as my S. with more on the way with the new crank pulley
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 12:02 PM
  #39  
tbirdscwd's Avatar
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,039
From: CA
Default RE: Which supercharger?

ORIGINAL: IanJK46conv

Ok, back up, noob here. P-1, D-1, PS1C, (pi) heads? Sorry. Feel like a dumb### asking but what do they mean? I want some ponies out of my car, so I need to understand what you guys are talking bout. Also, "banned." Whats wrong with the self contained units? If they don't affect efficiency and reliablity, and you have the patience to add more time to oil changes, why not?
P-1sc, D-1sc, are different models of self contained centrifugal superchargers made by Procharger. PI stands for "power imroved," which denotes a set of redesigned cylinder heads and intake manifold which replaced the previous design used on the 96-98 4.6l 2-valve. They came standard on all 99-04 mustang GTs.
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 03:08 AM
  #40  
2000GT4.6's Avatar
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,575
From: United States
Default RE: Which supercharger?

ORIGINAL: tbirdscwd

ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

and that blower/cooler is more than enough to out power the stock shortblock if you want (but not really enough when you go to rebuilding).
Does anyone on here have a built motor pushing some serious pressure on a procharger? I always found that notion weird. If you look at the stats, the P-1sc has the same flow ratings as a t-trim and a D-1 bests them both by 200cfm. They both can push more PSI and have higher Max impeller speeds, whats the deal?
The P1 is nowhere near the level of perfomance that a D1 or T trim will offer. The P1 starts to tap out before 500 WHP. The T is an upgrade to the SQ, and the SQ will still out perform a PS1C.

You just can't go by manufactuerer ratings. I dunno why, but it never seems to add up. You just have to take RL experence of others to see what will happen.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.