4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Bullitt vs. GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2005, 02:14 PM
  #1  
David_K
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
David_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,967
Default Bullitt vs. GT

I have an oportunity to purchase a 2001 s/c bullitt. I am dropping out of school because i just obtained my wholesalers dealers license. I trhink i remember reading somewhere that the heads on a bullitt are different from the heads on a Gt. i also read somewhere that the bullitt bottom end is pretty much bullit proff. can anybody give me any info on this?
David_K is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 02:27 PM
  #2  
code3GT
Mustang Nazi
 
code3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas, baby
Posts: 13,444
Default RE: Bullitt vs. GT

Same heads and bottom end. Only difference were appearence, handling and intake, I believe.
code3GT is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 02:40 PM
  #3  
tightdogal
5th Gear Member
 
tightdogal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 3,411
Default RE: Bullitt vs. GT

dropping out of school?? oh man thats no good....

yeah bullits have a better intake, slightly better suspension(me think) and better brakes...i think they onyl produce 10 more HP than stock gts
tightdogal is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 02:43 PM
  #4  
Fallstar01
4th Gear Member
 
Fallstar01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,654
Default RE: Bullitt vs. GT

That's correct, It's a GT engine with an aluminum intake with a weird plenum part which takes a cobra Throttle body. One or two of the pulleys are underdrive. It's got different struts shocks, springs, swaybars (not sure about subframes), some intererior and exterior dress up(pedals, wheels, fuel door, sidescoop deletes, no spoiler). The intake only gives like 5 more peak torque/hp but it does raise up the whole curve so it actually has more impact that you might think. I believe it also came with better mufflers.
Fallstar01 is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 04:30 PM
  #5  
Deannostang
3rd Gear Member
 
Deannostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 823
Default RE: Bullitt vs. GT

Dropping out of school is not good. At least get some kind of degree. No one can ever take that away from you and it proves to future employers that you can handle the work that is given you.

What they say about Bullitt's is true. Nice car, great color (most common is green which is my favorite color) and improved suspension and brakes. The intake is also an improved design. The Mustang model that all the auto publications went nuts over, and, rated the most bang-for-the-buck, is the Mach 1. If you are thinking about buying a Bullitt, find yourself a Mach 1 to test drive also. You may just be happy you did.

Good luck with your choices.
Deannostang is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 04:45 PM
  #6  
MikeHawke
Retired MF Moderator
 
MikeHawke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I live in Canada, eh
Posts: 7,156
Default RE: Bullitt vs. GT


ORIGINAL: Fallstar01

That's correct, It's a GT engine with an aluminum intake with a weird plenum part which takes a cobra Throttle body. One or two of the pulleys are underdrive. It's got different struts shocks, springs, swaybars (not sure about subframes), some intererior and exterior dress up(pedals, wheels, fuel door, sidescoop deletes, no spoiler). The intake only gives like 5 more peak torque/hp but it does raise up the whole curve so it actually has more impact that you might think. I believe it also came with better mufflers.
This is the correct answer and covers it all.....I'm not sure about the sidescoop delete though.

They were rated @ 272 hp while the GT was rated at 260.
MikeHawke is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 04:49 PM
  #7  
David_K
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
David_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,967
Default RE: Bullitt vs. GT

OK well i found out where i thought about the heads. my 5.0 magazine did a comparison between the ullitt mach 1 and 99 cobra and they said the bullit had lighter heads for a lower center of gravity. ill take a picture.

and on the school issue im sick of school. my dad didnt go to college and he owns and runs 23 apartment complexes across texas. so a degree is not neccesary.
David_K is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 05:01 PM
  #8  
sandcracker21
4th Gear Member
 
sandcracker21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,957
Default RE: Bullitt vs. GT

maybe so, but its a different time and age, and a degree will help you out a TON

trust me
sandcracker21 is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 11:36 PM
  #9  
David_K
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
David_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,967
Default RE: Bullitt vs. GT

why should i trust you? i dont even know you.
David_K is offline  
Old 05-06-2005, 11:48 PM
  #10  
silverbullittgt2001
1st Gear Member
 
silverbullittgt2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 65
Default RE: Bullitt vs. GT

the bullitt was rated at 265hp
silverbullittgt2001 is offline  


Quick Reply: Bullitt vs. GT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.