4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

300rwhp N/A 2V?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2008, 11:01 PM
  #21  
defconfire
5th Gear Member
 
defconfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cary/Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,791
Default

You can hit 300 with full Bolt-on's and cams. But not straight bolt-ons.
defconfire is offline  
Old 10-20-2008, 11:37 PM
  #22  
ZW99GT
6th Gear Member
 
ZW99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,797
Default

Originally Posted by Coronado01GT
300rwhp N/A 2V? = empty pockets and long road ahead of yourself......400rwhp S/C 2V! = empty pockets and a long weekend ahead of yourself
And isn't it funny that they all tend to run the same times at the track.

400rwhp S/C 2v isn't just as easy as throwing a blower on the car. It takes alot of supporting mods as well.
ZW99GT is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 12:01 AM
  #23  
dimebag
6th Gear Member
 
dimebag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earleville md
Posts: 10,357
Default

Originally Posted by bpark8824
Honestly you could do full bolt ons and not quite make 300, and in the end you end up spending as much as you could just to s/c it. Like a couple others said though its not all about the power numbers. Somebody with a bone stock 2v could beat a full bolt on 2v if the guy can't drive. I'm sure its happened.

If you really want power, you need to dig into her, and if your going to spend the money to get all out of her I think its alot easier to just s/c it. Correct me if im wrong but I think a lot of people on here will say the same. But if you REALLY wanna stay n/a, you might just make 300, with full exhaust, tb, plenium, cai, ect, ect,ect.

lol got a little laugh when i read that, when my car was stock(****, 2 months ago) thats what i did for fun, find full bolt on gts(t/b, plenum, cai, pullies, exhaust, gears) and beat them by half a car or so, then listen to them swear my **** wasnt stock and i had a gear or atleast something... it was quite fun
dimebag is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 12:31 AM
  #24  
Coronado01GT
1st Gear Member
 
Coronado01GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Illinois, Chicagoland
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by ZW99GT
And isn't it funny that they all tend to run the same times at the track.

400rwhp S/C 2v isn't just as easy as throwing a blower on the car. It takes alot of supporting mods as well.
ok, a little bit of a hyperbole.
Coronado01GT is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 12:35 AM
  #25  
myk
2nd Gear Member
 
myk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by JayC
Some of you people are just eat up over dyno numbers. My rag ran 12's all day long with 247rwhp.........................
Seriously. Don't let the number "300" dictate whether you and your car are fast or not. Ultimately, if reliability is an issue and you don't want to tear into the car you should've bought another platform, like an LSx based car. Or, F/I it and you won't have to dig too deep into the car, but then there's the reliability factor, again. Look, just make due with what you have and work on your driving skills...

Last edited by myk; 10-21-2008 at 12:37 AM.
myk is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 12:59 AM
  #26  
myslow2002gt
3rd Gear Member
 
myslow2002gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 578
Default

Originally Posted by Coronado01GT
300rwhp N/A 2V? = empty pockets and long road ahead of yourself......
Not exactly there chief. Easily obtainable these days with bolt ons and cams only. I'm right there myself, and don't have much money in my car.
myslow2002gt is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 03:34 AM
  #27  
StriderTacticaL
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
StriderTacticaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,842
Default

Originally Posted by myk
Seriously. Don't let the number "300" dictate whether you and your car are fast or not. Ultimately, if reliability is an issue and you don't want to tear into the car you should've bought another platform, like an LSx based car. Or, F/I it and you won't have to dig too deep into the car, but then there's the reliability factor, again. Look, just make due with what you have and work on your driving skills...

Yeah I guess. Well with all the mods I have in my sig now I think I just need gears and wider rims w/drag radials and then I think I can have a respectable track worthy car. Right now i'm running stock rims with 245's with Kumho ecsta ASX's which are the worst tires ever
StriderTacticaL is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 11:35 AM
  #28  
10inch Terror
2nd Gear Member
 
10inch Terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 402
Default

Bolt on and cams will get you there with stock heads (depending on how good the tune is). Won't do it without cams.
10inch Terror is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 12:33 PM
  #29  
jRock617
2nd Gear Member
 
jRock617's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 383
Default

if you do
long tubes
mid pipe
catback
intake plenum
throttle body
CAI
Underdrive pullies
Cam
93 octane tune

you will be be in the high 200 range.

if you do all that plus some new stage 2 heads, youll be at your goal.
jRock617 is offline  
Old 10-21-2008, 02:11 PM
  #30  
99GTvert
is my username.
 
99GTvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 13,807
Default

Without heads and cams, it helps to have a high reading dyno....

As for "well go just as fast as FI car"

Yes. BUT, which car feels faster when accelerating on the free way, the car with bolt ons and a 31 spline rear, or the car with a blower on it?
99GTvert is offline  


Quick Reply: 300rwhp N/A 2V?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.