4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

3.73 vs. 4.10s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2009, 12:22 AM
  #1  
tsarp90
Thread Starter
 
tsarp90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 26
Default 3.73 vs. 4.10s

Anyone know some pros and cons of them? I have heard good and bad about both and wanted to know what you guys think since you guys have been proven to be helpful before...
tsarp90 is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 12:55 AM
  #2  
Chubstang
5th Gear Member
 
Chubstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,236
Default

Not again.

https://mustangforums.com/forum/sear...earchid=490154
Chubstang is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 01:03 AM
  #3  
tsarp90
Thread Starter
 
tsarp90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 26
Default

thanks, i knew i was gonna get some kind of response like that

thanks
tsarp90 is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 01:48 AM
  #4  
StriderTacticaL
4th Gear Member
 
StriderTacticaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 1,842
Default

Sorry but I am gonna have to agree with Chub.....this topic has been BEAT TO DEATH....OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN
StriderTacticaL is offline  
Old 02-24-2009, 06:37 AM
  #5  
boduke0220
6th Gear Member
 
boduke0220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yadkin, Nc
Posts: 5,183
Default

go 4.10


/thread
boduke0220 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
02-03-2024 09:00 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
stealth_GT
The Racers Bench
4
09-22-2015 02:19 PM
JT76
Street/Strip
6
09-20-2015 11:32 AM
Darien
2005-2014 Mustangs
6
09-16-2015 09:30 AM



Quick Reply: 3.73 vs. 4.10s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM.