4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

88mm pro m MAF on 2000 gt?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2009, 10:06 AM
  #1  
ledee416
Thread Starter
 
ledee416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: florida
Posts: 10
Default 88mm pro m MAF on 2000 gt?

hey guys,

I recently came across an 88mm pro m MAF which says on it that it is calibrated for 19lb injectors. I have 19lb on my car still, and was wondering if I would get any decent performance boost from the 88mm maf. I currently have a bbk cai and free flow exhaust, as well as a jet stage 2 chip. I was told by several guys at the drag strip that an MAF upgrade is what I am missing. agree or disagree? the research I have done online shows mixed opinions. some seem to think it will cause detonation....(im thinking with the stage 2 chip reprogram that I will be fine)

again the sticker says it is calibrated for my stock injectors.
ledee416 is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 10:53 AM
  #2  
vanquish
4th Gear Member
 
vanquish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: asdf
Posts: 1,600
Default

You aren't maxing the capacity of your stock MAF so I don't think an aftermarket one is going to do anything.
vanquish is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 11:55 AM
  #3  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

It won't do anything for your performance. You'd be taking a gamble for no benefit. Don't even consider it.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 12:14 PM
  #4  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Originally Posted by mrtstang
It won't do anything for your performance. You'd be taking a gamble for no benefit. Don't even consider it.
Correct!
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 01:00 PM
  #5  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

The OEM 80mm MAF is good to 1150 kg/h (it "pegs" at 1220 kg/h) , which is 2535 lb/h of air. At 12.5:1 AFR, a bit rich for n/a, that 2535 lb/h of air would be mixed with 202.8 lbs of fuel, 202.8 lbs/h of fuel is 400HP+ for an n/a engine--which isn't going to happen, if running f/i it's still good to 335HP or so.

Tell the "several guys" at the strip they don't know what they are talking about...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 02:39 PM
  #6  
ledee416
Thread Starter
 
ledee416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: florida
Posts: 10
Default

hmmmm... ok thanks for the info.

I wonder why those dudes were so insistent on me changing out my maf. they both ran mustangs too. I think they were saying that with my CAI that the stock MAF body was the smallest and more restrictive part of the intake. Does that make any sense?

upgrading to a larger throttle body and plenum is a good idea though correct?

is there any reason to upgrade to a bigger MAF without changing the 19lb injectors?

I have an eaton m90 I was going to try and put on soon.
ledee416 is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 04:04 PM
  #7  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

The upper plenum is the most restrictive component of the stock intake, with the TB being second--read more about this here. There is no need for a larger MAF for any n/a application.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:42 PM
  #8  
ledee416
Thread Starter
 
ledee416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: florida
Posts: 10
Default

I saw a company (bbk) on the internet who has a one peice plenum and t body. it is 78mm. will this be too big for my car and hurt output? I am hoping to put a supercharger that a bought on the car eventually and was hoping to "grow into" this 78mm. thoughts?
ledee416 is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:52 PM
  #9  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

It won't hurt performance, it also won't help performance. as compared to any of the other after market TB/plenum combinations--unless you are running some incredible level of boost it's mostly a marketing gimmick...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 11:04 PM
  #10  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk
The OEM 80mm MAF is good to 1150 kg/h (it "pegs" at 1220 kg/h) , which is 2535 lb/h of air. At 12.5:1 AFR, a bit rich for n/a, that 2535 lb/h of air would be mixed with 202.8 lbs of fuel, 202.8 lbs/h of fuel is 400HP+ for an n/a engine--which isn't going to happen, if running f/i it's still good to 335HP or so.

Tell the "several guys" at the strip they don't know what they are talking about...
I bet the OP wishes he could just memorize that and spout it back at the schmucks at the track that are living in 80's w/ the 5.slows
Sxynerd is offline  


Quick Reply: 88mm pro m MAF on 2000 gt?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.