4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Predator sweetness

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 07:10 PM
  #21  
hpwrestler220's Avatar
hpwrestler220
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,817
From: NJ
Default

Not to hijack the thread, but Cliff, i have a diablosport. I loaded up the canned tune on my car and didnt mess with it.

You are saying that it automatically advances the timing by 2º by loading up the canned tune correct?? So if you have a 93 in your area, is it safe to run 6º of advanced timing? Will this even make a difference in the way that the car drives?

i forget if diablosport even allows for 87/89/93 tunes...im pretty sure i just uploaded the canned tune
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #22  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default

Originally Posted by atlst180
does the predator not have a tune that will work good in any climate as a base? Colder denser air goin through a engine require more fuel especially sense the predator puts the ecu on open loop taking the ecus self adjustability away anyway?
I don't know what "sense the predator puts the ecu on open loop taking the ecus self adjustability away anyway?" means. The Predator tune does not in any way affect the PCM's (Powertrain Control Module, Ford's name for ECU) decision making ability as to when closed loop and open loop operation is called for.

The PCM, via the MAF (Mass Air Flow sensor) handles air of differing densities quite nicely as it measures the mass (density) of the incomming air.

You seem to have a very confused understanding of how this all works, buy Greg Banish's book...
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 08:47 PM
  #23  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Pubydingus
1.what do you mean by getting our cars in open loop?
2. WOT mean pedal to the floor?
3. wasnt bogging at all last night or today under WOT if that means pedal down
4. 92 octane is our highest
5. where can i get a good WBO2 system
1. To be blunt, if you do not know the difference between closed and open loop operation you should not be mucking about with your engine's tune--buy Greg's book and read...

2. WOT is Wide Open Throttle;

3. The adaptive long term fuel trims, might let the PCM correct for the commanded over rich mix--you need to log short and long term trims to see what's really going on--I don't know for sure what +40% means to the Predator. but I'd bet the fuel trims are maxed out. There may also be other issues that make your engine's setup like a rich mix;

4. That's OK if you live somewhere that the normal ambient temps are under 95°;

5. I would recommend Innovate's LC-1, except that Innovate's support over the last 2 years has deteriorated to the point that it sucks. There are a number of other systems out there, Google "wideband O2" and pick one;
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 09:06 PM
  #24  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default

Originally Posted by hpwrestler220
Not to hijack the thread, but Cliff, i have a diablosport. I loaded up the canned tune on my car and didnt mess with it.

You are saying that it automatically advances the timing by 2º by loading up the canned tune correct?? So if you have a 93 in your area, is it safe to run 6º of advanced timing? Will this even make a difference in the way that the car drives?

i forget if diablosport even allows for 87/89/93 tunes...im pretty sure i just uploaded the canned tune
I have no intimate experience with the Predator, however based on what I know of industry practice, and what the Predator user's manual says, I suspect it's base 87 octane tune makes changes to the OEM tune as I highlighted above (+2° global, and +1.0° or so to the borderline table). These are dead safe increases to the stock tune's settings.

Beyond that, and due to the fact the the Predator apparently chooses to use percent based changes (as opposed to actual number of degrees), I would not venture to make any specific suggestions.

I use Delta Forces Commando system, and in what passes here for winter and 93 octane fuel, I run +4.5° total increase to the Global Spark Adder, and +1.5°, +2.0°, and +2.0° to the Spark Borderline Table in the higher load/rpm ranges. This means +6.5° total added advance at most loads/higher rpms.

As to whether it makes a difference--of course it does. By lighting the fire sooner, with slower burning fuel (I.e higher octane), higher peak combustion pressures are reached when the piston is traveling downward. This equals more power...

I don't wish to sound like a broken record here, however I STRONGLY recommend that those of you interested in tuning buy Greg's book. It is as easy reading as topic this complex can be, and will really give you a great understanding of what going on in there.

Another wonderful book is John Heywood's Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. I had the distinct privilege of studying under Dr. Heywood some several years ago. His book is the definitive resource for understanding how these things work.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 09:09 PM
  #25  
hpwrestler220's Avatar
hpwrestler220
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,817
From: NJ
Default

Sounds good Cliff. You the man.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #26  
Pubydingus's Avatar
Pubydingus
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 62
From: Washington
Default

so keep the timing up and and put the WOT back to where it was?
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 02:05 AM
  #27  
marcuslee842's Avatar
marcuslee842
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 894
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by Pubydingus
so keep the timing up and and put the WOT back to where it was?
Yep, that would be your best and safest bet. Just like he said the Predator will not let u do any outrageous advanced timing so just crank it up and use the highest octane gas u can. I have been using premium gas with my advanced timing and everything is fine.
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 05:48 PM
  #28  
atlst180's Avatar
atlst180
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
From: wa
Default

soo if his car does cut out and seems to like the fuel 15% more not 40% with intake plenum and exhaust,4.11s wich according to diablo requires a custom tune wich constatutes more fuel ?
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 06:22 PM
  #29  
atlst180's Avatar
atlst180
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5
From: wa
Default

cliffy im asumeing you are a tech so if you could use your sources to find a safe fuel setting for an 02 with 80k exhaust (catless) bbk intake and plenum, 4.11 gears? and properly gapped iridium plugs and 92 oct, need more fuel with more air? to rich is better then being lean right?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uberstang1
4.6L General Discussion
67
Dec 7, 2017 07:10 AM
dubarado
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
6
Dec 23, 2015 01:16 PM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
3
Sep 15, 2015 07:34 PM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
4
Aug 13, 2015 08:06 AM
Mnuckolls
4.0L V6 Technical Discussions
3
Aug 9, 2015 08:54 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 AM.