4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Is it safe to use 91 Octane on a 93 tune?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2010, 04:15 PM
  #11  
Moonshine
5th Gear Member
 
Moonshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wa
Posts: 2,293
Default

I just said, I run 91o w/ a 93o program. NO PINGING. NO PINGING. NO PINGING. There's NOTHING to worry about.
Moonshine is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 04:25 PM
  #12  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by Moonshine
I just said, I run 91o w/ a 93o program. NO PINGING. NO PINGING. NO PINGING. There's NOTHING to worry about.
That means it's a 91 octane tune--an proper 93 octane tune would ping like Hëll with 91 octane...

Last edited by cliffyk; 03-26-2010 at 04:46 PM.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 04:56 PM
  #13  
Moonshine
5th Gear Member
 
Moonshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wa
Posts: 2,293
Default

*sigh* You just contradicted your previous statement that there is no such thing as an octane tune.

Do you have the same programmer as I do? Does it have a '91' octane preset? No, it does not. It has a '93' octane preset. All possible parameters are adjustable. With my programmer I am set on a 93o preset. How many times can I tell you that my engine does not ping. Under any condition.


I run a 93o preset and feed the engine 91o fuel. NO PINGING. NO PINGING. NO PINGING.

Do you have a handheld programmer for your vehicle?
Moonshine is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 05:32 PM
  #14  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by Moonshine
*sigh* You just contradicted your previous statement that there is no such thing as an octane tune.
I realise that now that you have chosen to highlight same, I should have placed "93 octane tune" in quotes...

Do you have the same programmer as I do?


I use a customised version of Delta Force Tuning's Special Forces/Delta Force/Commando tuning system.

Does it have a '91' octane preset? No, it does not.



As to a 91 octane preset, the closest thing I have to a hand held (Delta Force's Special Forces software) does have a 91 preset--as well as 87, 93, 96, 100, 104, 106, 110, 111, 116 and 118 (these latter being common racing and aviation grades). However I only use Special Forces to create base tunes for further modification with Delta Force/Commando.

It has a '93' octane preset. All possible parameters are adjustable. With my programmer I am set on a 93o preset. How many times can I tell you that my engine does not ping. Under any condition.

I run a 93o preset and feed the engine 91o fuel. NO PINGING. NO PINGING. NO PINGING.
I do not doubt at all that your "93 octane tune" does not ping on 91 octane fuel--I am simply stating that what your tuning system put forth as "93 octane" tune was not--if it were it would ping with 91 octane fuel...

Do you have a handheld programmer for your vehicle?


No, as stated previously I use Delta Force's Special Forces/Delta Force/Commando software, and their interface box, for flashing the tune.

However I have had the opportunity to do low-level analyses of many "canned/preset" tunes, for various octane selections, and produced by several hand held units.

They are mostly the same, bumping the Global Spark Adder by 1.0° to 2.0°, and the upper load/rpm cells in the Spark Borderline table by 0.5° to 1.5°. Some will also lean out the Open Loop Fuel table by a few percent for the later strategies/box codes. Other changes are typically to the delays for switching to open loop, pushing the max acceptable MAF voltage to 4.999, and a few other well known tweaks to make things a bit more "perky".

These are all changes that all but the worst example of 87 octane gasoline will support, and largely reflect the poor state of the OEM tune.

-----------------------------------
PS: Sorry to have bored you in my previous post *sigh*
cliffyk is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 08:24 PM
  #15  
Moonshine
5th Gear Member
 
Moonshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wa
Posts: 2,293
Default

hehe Yea just a tad lengthy. I appreciate your knowledge in the matter.

Just out of curiosity have you used any hotter fuels than 91?

The flashpoint temps between 91 and 93 are so minimal dude it'd be hard to tell the difference.

All I'm sayin is the kid will be fine with a 93o setting running 91o. I'm just answering his question.
Moonshine is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 08:42 PM
  #16  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Flashpoint is only minimally related to resistance to detonation, a broad indicator at best, as it is the temperature at which a volatile liquid vapourises and forms an ignitable mixture with air (assumed to be somewhere near STP).

A fuel's resistance to detonation in an internal combustion engine is dependent on the fuel's (fuel here being a mixture of air and gasoline being compressed in a closed combustion chamber) autoignition temperature--a pressure, temperature, and AFR related parameter.

Have you read Heywood or Ferguson? If not you should, as either text would greatly expand your knowledge of internal combustion engine fundamentals.

Last edited by cliffyk; 03-26-2010 at 09:09 PM.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 08:54 PM
  #17  
jvog
5th Gear Member
 
jvog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 2,825
Default

Cliff just schooled you.
jvog is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 09:32 PM
  #18  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by Moonshine
Just out of curiosity have you used any hotter fuels than 91?
"Hotter than 91"--whooo-wheee!

93 is available all year here in Florida--it's all I run...

In the late 60s/early 70s we got 96 Octane at the Sunoco pumps, then 94 octane up 'til the early 90s. My '69 Charger Daytona (440 with 3 Holley 500cfm deuces--aka "6-pack") could pass anything but a Sunoco station.

When I was a lot younger I ran Hodaka 125 Wombats in motocross racing using a blend of 96 octane "blue" Sunoco and 8 oz/gallon of toluene (140 octane)--I used to keep 2 or 3 pistons "on the shelf" in the workshop at any point in time.

It's a sad state of affairs we find ourselves in when 91 octane is considered "hot"...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 09:55 PM
  #19  
jojo2003
2nd Gear Member
 
jojo2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 347
Default

I run the 91 octane with a 93 tune as well, and the guys at Diablo said to just retard the spark by 2 degrees. I had the pinging before I retarded it, and after it went away.
jojo2003 is offline  
Old 03-26-2010, 10:10 PM
  #20  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by jojo2003
I run the 91 octane with a 93 tune as well, and the guys at Diablo said to just retard the spark by 2 degrees. I had the pinging before I retarded it, and after it went away.
Then you are no longer running a "93 octane tune"--it's a "93 octane tune" derated to a "91 octane tune" by retarding the timing...
cliffyk is offline  


Quick Reply: Is it safe to use 91 Octane on a 93 tune?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.