4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

If Im Running 13PSI Of Boost.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2011, 05:21 PM
  #11  
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
 
Soldier GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Posts: 10,696
Default

Originally Posted by uberstang1
Don't feed the troll.
agreed. Did he even mention what kind of mustang he had???
Soldier GT is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 05:39 PM
  #12  
scottybaccus
2nd Gear Member
 
scottybaccus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 486
Default

So Cliffy, Is 80% a good target duuty cycle? I thought that was on the high side of comfortable.
scottybaccus is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 06:13 PM
  #13  
foru2nv4
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
foru2nv4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 221
Default

Its a GT stock internals. Thanks everyone
foru2nv4 is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 06:20 PM
  #14  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

Originally Posted by Sash
my car made 463 with 42 and they have plenty more to support,eater 42 or 60,Ill say go for 60 so you have more room to grow.
good luck.
Sash i'm really surprised you had a lot of room left in those 42's with your power. Did Lidio say at what percent duty they were working at?
mrtstang is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 06:46 PM
  #15  
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
 
Soldier GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Posts: 10,696
Default

Originally Posted by foru2nv4
Its a GT stock internals. Thanks everyone
Soooooooooooooo what year??
Soldier GT is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 07:40 PM
  #16  
Sash
2nd Gear Member
 
Sash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 355
Default

Originally Posted by mrtstang
Sash i'm really surprised you had a lot of room left in those 42's with your power. Did Lidio say at what percent duty they were working at?
the fuel pump was at 80% and injectors was not even close to be max out,I dont know what was the % for the injectors,but i know for sure lightning 90mm MAF bottom out at 460RWHP.
rod, that dude Chris is making 500+ with 39....
Sash is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 08:36 PM
  #17  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

Originally Posted by Sash
the fuel pump was at 80% and injectors was not even close to be max out,I dont know what was the % for the injectors,but i know for sure lightning 90mm MAF bottom out at 460RWHP.
rod, that dude Chris is making 500+ with 39....
Yeah now that you mention Chris's ride it kind of all makes sense when i think about it. I forgot for a moment that you have a 5.0 stroker motor, and not the regular 4.6. That right there helps to explain your scenario as well.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 09:02 PM
  #18  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Two years ago
https://mustangforums.com/forum/6218741-post5.html
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 09-03-2011, 12:34 PM
  #19  
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
LilRoush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South FL
Posts: 8,540
Default

Originally Posted by foru2nv4
is 30lbs injectors enough for the supercharger or do I go bigger? The car doesnt hesitated or anything. Im figurin car around 500 HP engine. FYI, I have a series IV saleen supercharger with a smaller pulley upgraded to 75mm accufab TB put in 4.10 gears JLT true cold air gatorback belt supercharger came with 30lbs injectors and saleen programmed at the saleen facility.
Try again on the numbers guessing. The Saleen tune tended to put down 300 rwhp out of the box. That set up is well known for being over rated in the HP department, and even with a pulley swap/supporting mods/retune will only flirt with 400ish.
LilRoush is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 10:42 PM
  #20  
Stang9946
4th Gear Member
 
Stang9946's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,648
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk
Here are a couple formulas for making "starting point" sort of design decisions:

Basic formula for flywheel HP:



where:
HPmax = flywheel horsepower;
lb/h = actual injector capacity at the design pressure differential;
Dutycycle = maximum desired duty cycle as a decimal number;
Cyls = number of cylinders/injectors;
BSFC = Brake Specific Fuel Consumption--rule of thumb values = 0.5 lb/h for n/a and 0.6 lb/h for f/i;


Calculate injector capacity for altered fuel pressure differentials:



where it is spelled out pretty clearly.

FRPP injectors are rated at 39.15 psi, so the rating in their specs should be used with an unmodified returnless fuel system.

If you increase the fuel pressure then use 39.15 as the "oldPSI".

With return type systems things get a bit more complex because the differential fuel pressure across the injector becomes the rail pressure minus the manifold pressure.

So while not in boost it is the rail pressure minus the negative pressure (vacuum) in the manifold--E.g. with 20 inHg vaccum (-9.8 psi) and 30 psi rail pressure the differential across the injector is 30 - (-9.8) = 39.8 psi.

In boost at 10 psi manifold pressure and 30 psi at the fuel rail the drop across the injector is only 30 - 10, or 20 psi. Without boosting the rail pressure your 42 lb/h injector just became a 30 lb/h injector;

(20/39.15)^0.5 * 42 = 30.0

This is why vacuum/boost controlled AFPRs are common on return type systems.
This gave me a good chuckle.
Stang9946 is offline  


Quick Reply: If Im Running 13PSI Of Boost.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM.