4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

300HP recommendations?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 10:41 PM
  #61  
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,481
From: NC
Default

Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but it would be nice to have actual dyno data to support the "gain" from a CAI on a mostly stock motor. I'm betting a full CAI is worth less than 2rwhp vs. simply dropping a K&N into the stock airbox (on a mostly stock motor).

You would NEVER feel any difference from the CAI. Maybe perceive a difference due to the change in sound though, and the desire to get a gain from any mod we do.
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 10:51 PM
  #62  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default

I have been present, at Raabe Racing in Daytona, when back-to-back runs were done with the stock CAI and BBK's, both with air filters installed and without them--so here's the dirty little secret.

It make no measurable or otherwise meaningful difference, in fact one of the runs with the stock CAI and a Purolator paper filter outperformed (by a tiny but statistically irrelevant bit) all of the other combinations including no filter at all.

FWIW catted vs. off road X and H pipes work pretty much the same way, the only real difference is noise and stink...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
Nov 27, 2015 07:50 PM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:02 AM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
Sep 30, 2015 10:13 AM
nboost
5.0L GT S550 Tech
7
Sep 16, 2015 05:35 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.