4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Spark plug install question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2012 | 06:20 PM
  #1  
stevednmc's Avatar
stevednmc
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 814
From: Nebraska
Default Spark plug install question...

Ok, This weekend I will be replacing my injectors, and figured while im there may as well replace the spark plugs and check the COP boots. My question is is it wise to use some antiseize on the new plugs on this motor? I usually use it but I wanna make sure itll be ok on this motor.. Got my torque wrench handy and ready to go. Also...is the correct gap around .052 or so for a stock engine?
Old Jan 5, 2012 | 06:29 PM
  #2  
jtb727's Avatar
jtb727
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
From: AZ
Default

I dont remember what I gapped mine at, whatever FORD reccomends until your running boost or spray everyone says to run them at .035 but your .052 for NA doesnt sound far off, I remember thinking it was pretty high. I used Anti-Sieze and have had no problems.
Old Jan 5, 2012 | 06:54 PM
  #3  
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,613
From: Lincoln, NE
Default

Anti-seize and dielectric grease.

What's wrong with the injectors?
Old Jan 5, 2012 | 07:02 PM
  #4  
stevednmc's Avatar
stevednmc
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 814
From: Nebraska
Default

I forgot the dielectric grease!!!! Arrrgh...

Nothing is wrong with them. Going to 24lb/hr injectors. CliffyK and I had a nice long conversation about it so im gonna try it out.
Old Jan 5, 2012 | 09:01 PM
  #5  
jtb727's Avatar
jtb727
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
From: AZ
Default

Share the light on the new injectors my friend!
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 02:47 AM
  #6  
Crispy2000Gt's Avatar
Crispy2000Gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 283
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by jtb727
Share the light on the new injectors my friend!
+1^^^
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 06:31 AM
  #7  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default

This is from our "discussion", Steve had asked about my using the FRPP 24 lb/h injectors. Make note that they absolutely 110% DO require re-tuning to have the low and high injector slopes, break-point and minimum pulse width set to the new injector's recommended values (see chart below).

The stock 19 lb/h injectors (orange) on the '99 through '02 GTs are barely adequate to supply the stock engine, approaching 90% duty cycle at WOT and revs over 5000 rpm. They are the same injectors used on the non-PI engines ('96-'98) and should have been upgraded in '99 for use in the PI engine.

After the the '99 Cobra horsepower debacle Ford began a review of the HP claims for all their line, and in the very last of the 2002 MY, and in '03 and '04, installed 21 lb/h (lavender) injectors in the GT. These provided better support for the 4.6L 2V's claimed 260 fwHP, operating at a more sensible 80% duty cycle when flat out.

However with even modest hardware modifications (intake and exhaust), and re-tuning to take advantage of such mods (which pump up mid-range power mostly, but also let the engine pull strongly right up to the rev-limiter), the 21 lb/h injectors once again get up into a 90%+ duty cycle.

With my mods and tune I dyno'd at 252/295 rwHP/torque with the 21 lb/h injectors, and 262/305 re-tuned using the 24 lb/h units.

So there you have it, keeping the injector duty cycle under 80% allows more precise fuel control...
Also,

If you wish to get a set of the FRPP 24 lb/h injectors then do it in the near future as they were discontinued by FRPP 1-1/2 years or so ago. They can still be found from a few vendors--Google FRPP m-9593-aa302. Brothers Performance says they have them for $170, but their availability is drying up rapidly.

The MSRP was $250, most suggested replacements are in that range...
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is the calibration summary from FRPP, it is only the fur values in the upper left that are required to be changed on an EECV tune. FWIW on my '03 GT I settled in on a high slope value of 25.58 lb/h as it was running rich at WOT with the suggested 24.30 lb/h value.

Old Jan 6, 2012 | 07:25 AM
  #8  
stevednmc's Avatar
stevednmc
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 814
From: Nebraska
Default

Ahhh. Cliffy to the rescue! Sorry fellas, I logged off and didnt get back to ya. Didnt mean to be so cryptic, but Cliffy explained better than I would have so i guess its still a win!
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 08:14 AM
  #9  
!KLeech!'s Avatar
!KLeech!
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 106
From: Indiana
Default

yes use anti seize, this well help the spark plug blow out problem by not letting the plugs begin to seize and eat at the threads..
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 08:46 AM
  #10  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default

FWIW, in the factory shop manuals Ford makes no mention of using any compound of any sort on the plug threads--however under scheduled maintenance they would only be changed twice¹, every 100k miles, over the entire life of the vehicle.

That said I use never-seize, having changed/pulled-replaced the plugs at least a dozen times since owning the car...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
¹ - Once at 100k and again at 200k, then maybe again at 300k?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM.