stock hp
11-13-2005, 12:20 AM
#5
RE: stock hp
Yea what pipsblackstang said, oh by the way is it a standard or or an auto? Won't make a difference in your overall hp, but will make a drastic difference in your 0-60, autos are, on adverage, almost a second slower than their manual counter parts, well except for the new stangs that have 5 sp autos, wich are about .3seconds slower. Oh and another thing, that's 225 off of the flywheel, I think your rear whell hp is about 180, give or take 5 hp.
11-13-2005, 02:00 PM
#7
Retired MF Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
RE: stock hp
autos aren't THAT much slower than 5 speeds. where'd you get a second from? every time slip and paper race i've seen is about half a second at most.
oh, and it's 215HP at the flywheel, not 225. 225 was for the 98, the 96/97 was 215.
oh, and it's 215HP at the flywheel, not 225. 225 was for the 98, the 96/97 was 215.
11-13-2005, 02:46 PM
#8
RE: stock hp
[sm=bustedsign.gif]OK so I was a little off, but I know for sure that the 94-04 sixs do run almost a second slower than their manual counterparts, my buddies 00 hits 0-60 in the high 8s and I believe the manuals run in the low to high 7s. Oh by the way were those time slips for the new stang, or were they for the 94-04s. The new stang is I think .3 at best slower than the manual. But our 94-04 have one less gear to play with and that can seriously hamper your accelleration. 
Oh I wish now that I had bought that 02 cobra, had the money, but mom and dad said no, nice 01 GT, no, very nice 98 GT, no, damn couldn't win, wish I would of gotten a manual though.
Oh I wish now that I had bought that 02 cobra, had the money, but mom and dad said no, nice 01 GT, no, very nice 98 GT, no, damn couldn't win, wish I would of gotten a manual though.
11-13-2005, 03:15 PM
#9
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 3,645
RE: stock hp
ORIGINAL: nanaki
autos aren't THAT much slower than 5 speeds. where'd you get a second from? every time slip and paper race i've seen is about half a second at most.
oh, and it's 215HP at the flywheel, not 225. 225 was for the 98, the 96/97 was 215.
autos aren't THAT much slower than 5 speeds. where'd you get a second from? every time slip and paper race i've seen is about half a second at most.
oh, and it's 215HP at the flywheel, not 225. 225 was for the 98, the 96/97 was 215.
11-13-2005, 03:37 PM
#10
Retired MF Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
RE: stock hp
ORIGINAL: jthorn9
[sm=bustedsign.gif]OK so I was a little off, but I know for sure that the 94-04 sixs do run almost a second slower than their manual counterparts, my buddies 00 hits 0-60 in the high 8s and I believe the manuals run in the low to high 7s. Oh by the way were those time slips for the new stang, or were they for the 94-04s. The new stang is I think .3 at best slower than the manual. But our 94-04 have one less gear to play with and that can seriously hamper your accelleration.Oh I wish now that I had bought that 02 cobra, had the money, but mom and dad said no, nice 01 GT, no, very nice 98 GT, no, damn couldn't win, wish I would of gotten a manual though.
[sm=bustedsign.gif]OK so I was a little off, but I know for sure that the 94-04 sixs do run almost a second slower than their manual counterparts, my buddies 00 hits 0-60 in the high 8s and I believe the manuals run in the low to high 7s. Oh by the way were those time slips for the new stang, or were they for the 94-04s. The new stang is I think .3 at best slower than the manual. But our 94-04 have one less gear to play with and that can seriously hamper your accelleration.
Oh I wish now that I had bought that 02 cobra, had the money, but mom and dad said no, nice 01 GT, no, very nice 98 GT, no, damn couldn't win, wish I would of gotten a manual though.
even if the autos have one less gear, how often do you reach the end of 4th having to shift into 5th in the quarter?
