Paging YoteeHunter...
12-08-2005, 08:34 AM
#3
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 607
RE: Paging YoteeHunter...
Yes. I suppose a page would be a call-out. Typical newbie...wants to jump on board and run his mouth. How old are you? 15? 16?
You misunderstand. I don't like bull crap, and quite frankly you are full of it.
Let's see...where shall we start:
1. You can't spell, read, or write.
2. Ford doesn't have the most efficient engine...not by a long shot
3. Euros are more efficient and better designed vehicles.
4. The LS1 gets better fuel mileage then the 99-04 Mustangs.
5. In 1996 Ford brought out the first 4.6 V8 and you claim:
"you will not find another motor out there in the same year from any manufacture forign or domestic that will match the performance and effeciency of the little 4.6."
Would you like me to list every vehicle that is more efficient then first 4.6 or just a few?
For crying out loud, every Japanese V6 in 1996 made around 200hp. Lexus had a 250hp 4.0 V8, BMW 3.0 liter made 240hp, Infiniti's 4.5 with 280 something HP. You wouldn't know efficiency if it smacked you in the face. A 1992 Honda Prelude makes 160hp out of a 2.3 liter 4 cylinder. Do that math...if Ford made a vehicle exactly that efficent, it would make 320hp. Granted...it took a Cobra to get that 7 years later.
Granted torque is important...but torque doesn't make you fast. If you beg to differ...then explain how.
Talk trash all you want...but how about YOU face the facts.
Almost every foreign vehicle out there is more efficient. Break down the numbers...even today there is no comparison. Most Japanese V6s are over 250hp. Ford stays about 5-7 years behind. Ford is happy to announce their first 3 valve 5.4! 3 valves??? You have gotta be kidding. Honda/Nissan/Toyota were running 4 valve DOHC 15 years ago!
You get what you pay for...
You misunderstand. I don't like bull crap, and quite frankly you are full of it.
Let's see...where shall we start:
1. You can't spell, read, or write.
2. Ford doesn't have the most efficient engine...not by a long shot
3. Euros are more efficient and better designed vehicles.
4. The LS1 gets better fuel mileage then the 99-04 Mustangs.
5. In 1996 Ford brought out the first 4.6 V8 and you claim:
"you will not find another motor out there in the same year from any manufacture forign or domestic that will match the performance and effeciency of the little 4.6."
Would you like me to list every vehicle that is more efficient then first 4.6 or just a few?
For crying out loud, every Japanese V6 in 1996 made around 200hp. Lexus had a 250hp 4.0 V8, BMW 3.0 liter made 240hp, Infiniti's 4.5 with 280 something HP. You wouldn't know efficiency if it smacked you in the face. A 1992 Honda Prelude makes 160hp out of a 2.3 liter 4 cylinder. Do that math...if Ford made a vehicle exactly that efficent, it would make 320hp. Granted...it took a Cobra to get that 7 years later.
Granted torque is important...but torque doesn't make you fast. If you beg to differ...then explain how.
Talk trash all you want...but how about YOU face the facts.
Almost every foreign vehicle out there is more efficient. Break down the numbers...even today there is no comparison. Most Japanese V6s are over 250hp. Ford stays about 5-7 years behind. Ford is happy to announce their first 3 valve 5.4! 3 valves??? You have gotta be kidding. Honda/Nissan/Toyota were running 4 valve DOHC 15 years ago!
You get what you pay for...
12-08-2005, 02:17 PM
#6
EXTREME Moderation
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: BLAM-O
Posts: 7,895
RE: Paging YoteeHunter...
ORIGINAL: Tim37
ok i am trying to figure out who the dick is here.
ok i am trying to figure out who the dick is here.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galactic
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
10
04-29-2019 02:56 PM
xbmx89
Texas Regional Chapter
1
11-10-2015 10:43 PM
