Why not Ford?
#21
RE: Why not Ford?
Well 03YellowPony,
The G92 IROC-Z could pull .89 on the skid pad and the 00-02 SLP/Bilstein optioned Camaro SS's pulled .90 on the skid pad. My Cobalt SS pulls .89 on the skid pad.
So you be the judge...........
The G92 IROC-Z could pull .89 on the skid pad and the 00-02 SLP/Bilstein optioned Camaro SS's pulled .90 on the skid pad. My Cobalt SS pulls .89 on the skid pad.
So you be the judge...........
#22
RE: Why not Ford?
ORIGINAL: codyss
Well 03YellowPony,
The G92 IROC-Z could pull .89 on the skid pad and the 00-02 SLP/Bilstein optioned Camaro SS's pulled .90 on the skid pad. My Cobalt SS pulls .89 on the skid pad.
So you be the judge...........
Well 03YellowPony,
The G92 IROC-Z could pull .89 on the skid pad and the 00-02 SLP/Bilstein optioned Camaro SS's pulled .90 on the skid pad. My Cobalt SS pulls .89 on the skid pad.
So you be the judge...........
#23
RE: Why not Ford?
Ford uses there engineers where as GM does not in my opinion. GM cars until very recently all, yes all, use a 350 (vans, lux cars trucks, vettes, camaros,TAs). Ford makes great power out of smaller engines, which helps gas milage, and overall cost of the product. If you remember the 2000 cobra R had 385 hp which is much more than the all GM cars of that time but the Z06, and this was still out of a smaller engine. Like someone said earlier in the post ford also considers the aftermarket parts craze when they produce new cars. Ford makes the GT model for people who want power (and a damn good looking car) but do go race on the weekend, but they also know with a few mods that the GT is capable of beating a LS1 TA or camaro.
#24
RE: Why not Ford?
JD1969
The styling is completely opinion. FWIW mine does not rattle much if at all, I know they are not all like mine but this is just what I can say having owned one. As for style and interior the 99-04 Stangs have basicly the same interior as the 94, and the shifter is is a very awkward position and to me, the Camaro SS and WS6 cars look way more aggressive than a Stang, again though just IMO.
The styling is completely opinion. FWIW mine does not rattle much if at all, I know they are not all like mine but this is just what I can say having owned one. As for style and interior the 99-04 Stangs have basicly the same interior as the 94, and the shifter is is a very awkward position and to me, the Camaro SS and WS6 cars look way more aggressive than a Stang, again though just IMO.
And also i was wondering why Chevy made the Camaro, Ponitac made the TA, AND the Firebird. why did ponitac make 2 of the same cars? or is there a diffrence other then looks. whick one costs more? is there better suspenison, or is it all for looks?
#25
RE: Why not Ford?
Ford/Motorcraft/SVT have GM beat for one reason. . .
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/4303/
The greatest Mustang EVER!!!
[IMG]local://upfiles/25836/3F3AB11963B147A1945A0ADDDB24FC2B.jpg[/IMG]
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/4303/
The greatest Mustang EVER!!!
[IMG]local://upfiles/25836/3F3AB11963B147A1945A0ADDDB24FC2B.jpg[/IMG]
#26
RE: Why not Ford?
ORIGINAL: n/a_threat
Ford/Motorcraft/SVT have GM beat for one reason. . .
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/4303/
The greatest Mustang EVER!!!
[IMG]local://upfiles/25836/3F3AB11963B147A1945A0ADDDB24FC2B.jpg[/IMG]
Ford/Motorcraft/SVT have GM beat for one reason. . .
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/4303/
The greatest Mustang EVER!!!
[IMG]local://upfiles/25836/3F3AB11963B147A1945A0ADDDB24FC2B.jpg[/IMG]
#27
RE: Why not Ford?
ORIGINAL: Derf00
Okay I like the engine mods but that damn body kit makes it look like a buck toof wabbit! It may kick some serious **** but i'd feel like a tool if I wasn't racing it.
ORIGINAL: n/a_threat
Ford/Motorcraft/SVT have GM beat for one reason. . .
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/4303/
The greatest Mustang EVER!!!
[IMG]local://upfiles/25836/3F3AB11963B147A1945A0ADDDB24FC2B.jpg[/IMG]
Ford/Motorcraft/SVT have GM beat for one reason. . .
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/4303/
The greatest Mustang EVER!!!
[IMG]local://upfiles/25836/3F3AB11963B147A1945A0ADDDB24FC2B.jpg[/IMG]
#28
RE: Why not Ford?
i think that the firebird was considered the v6 version. I believe that to be called you must have a V8, but who knows and who cares i am a mustang man. Oh and the Super Stallion was a piece of work could also run on alcohol i believe, another reason why i said ford uses there engineers. Cars like that and other SVE cars as well as SVT cars are just amazing.
#29
RE: Why not Ford?
ORIGINAL: JD1969
The styling is completely opinion. FWIW mine does not rattle much if at all, I know they are not all like mine but this is just what I can say having owned one. As for style and interior the 99-04 Stangs have basicly the same interior as the 94, and the shifter is is a very awkward position and to me, the Camaro SS and WS6 cars look way more aggressive than a Stang, again though just IMO.
The styling is completely opinion. FWIW mine does not rattle much if at all, I know they are not all like mine but this is just what I can say having owned one. As for style and interior the 99-04 Stangs have basicly the same interior as the 94, and the shifter is is a very awkward position and to me, the Camaro SS and WS6 cars look way more aggressive than a Stang, again though just IMO.
#30
RE: Why not Ford?
ORIGINAL: JD1969.
The styling is completely opinion. FWIW mine does not rattle much if at all, I know they are not all like mine but this is just what I can say having owned one. As for style and interior the 99-04 Stangs have basicly the same interior as the 94, and the shifter is is a very awkward position and to me, the Camaro SS and WS6 cars look way more aggressive than a Stang, again though just IMO.
The styling is completely opinion. FWIW mine does not rattle much if at all, I know they are not all like mine but this is just what I can say having owned one. As for style and interior the 99-04 Stangs have basicly the same interior as the 94, and the shifter is is a very awkward position and to me, the Camaro SS and WS6 cars look way more aggressive than a Stang, again though just IMO.