4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

4.6 compared to 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2005, 05:29 PM
  #1  
elchilote
Thread Starter
 
elchilote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 15
Default 4.6 compared to 5.0

Hey guys im sorry for this question i know theres alot newbs that come in here and ask it but i had a older mustang 5.0. right now i have a project honda (i know probably gettin flamed for that.) so im selling it for 5 gs and i want to get a mustang but not a old one. I want like a 94 up convertible. How does the 4.6 compare to the 5.0?? thanks you for the input
elchilote is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 05:47 PM
  #2  
dlazrael
5th Gear Member
 
dlazrael's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,111
Default RE: 4.6 compared to 5.0

Depends what you're doing. I've had a 5.0 (95 GT) and 2 4.6's, One a 2v, and the other a 4v. Ive found the 4.6 is a better engine, the 5.0 has more available mods to it. And IMHO the 99-04 body is the best one out there :-p Sell the foxbody, and the ricer POS, and get a real car, like a Mach1 or a Cobra :-p
dlazrael is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 05:55 PM
  #3  
Tim37
4th Gear Member
 
Tim37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: AR
Posts: 1,925
Default RE: 4.6 compared to 5.0

the 99up 4.6l and all the v4 4.6l cars are very suprising a littel costly to build but they are great engines this is my first one and it has suprised me. the 96-98 gt's are a littel lackign but nothign a head swap can't solve.
Tim37 is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 06:13 PM
  #4  
Matts00GT
4th Gear Member
 
Matts00GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,756
Default RE: 4.6 compared to 5.0

5.0 is cheaper and cheaper to mod. 4.6 is more expensive and more expensive to mod. 4.6 has more power stock and the 99-04 is imo the best looking stang they've made.
Matts00GT is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 06:43 PM
  #5  
silver04stang
2nd Gear Member
 
silver04stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 210
Default RE: 4.6 compared to 5.0

In my opinion the 5.0s are cheaper to mod and you can get more power out of them. I own a 99+ 2v. I would either say if you dont want the fox body style, go with a 94-95 5.0 or go with a 4.6 4V motor.
silver04stang is offline  
Old 12-27-2005, 10:55 PM
  #6  
elchilote
Thread Starter
 
elchilote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 15
Default RE: 4.6 compared to 5.0

thanks guys and yea gettin rid of ricer although i have to say i spanked a couple of dunm kids in GTs in my little honda. they werent real car guys like you guys though just stupid kids. Thanks again
elchilote is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
10-16-2015 08:13 PM
mustang0291
5.0L General Discussion
6
10-12-2015 07:55 AM
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2015 09:37 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM



Quick Reply: 4.6 compared to 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.