meebix

LS1's look ****ty in comparison to Stangs =) I don't like their design.. very aerodynamic, but looks very eh. Thats my .02 even though it could rip my 00' GT, but whatever, they look gay.

sickspeedgt

i drove my friends 01 z28 auto, that car hauled, and it was bone stock, he beat me by about 2 car lengths when i had my 96 cobra, with quite a few bolt ons. But i agree they just don't look as good as a mustang

Sonic3v

LS1 + Bolt ons + Cam = 400hp. Stop dreaming...really.

Albizo66

haha and thats with a mild cam

Jglisson

Sonic,

Shutup would you? You are looking stupid the more you type. LS1 wins hands down. What are you so bothered about it for. Get over it...if pure out HP in stock form is the name of the game, then sell out and buy one. Otherwise...shutup about. Talking trash won't make your GT faster or the LS1 slower.

czwalga00gt

Keep dreaming my friend, i worked at a chevy/pontiac dealership one summer, my job was to pretty much drive cars around... and pick them up from auctions.

Its not even close...

Sonic3v

For real.

Jiggy_One

Just remember guys, the LS1 is a 5.7 liter compared to our 4.6L. I would assume just from hearing those facts that the 4.6 would be slower. No wonder it takes a full bolton with juice to take the LS1, they got 1.1 liters on us. Thats more motor difference between the two than my bike has total.

GTowner4life

First of all if i wanted to hear people talk sh*t about mustangs i would of gone to camaro forums. Second, why do people go around asking who’s faster? Why dont you find out for yourself. Im just learning how to drive stick in my Roush and odds are some ricer would beet me. Its all about the driver. If a corvette miss a gear or cant drive than what prevents a upgraded mustang from winning? I don’t care if my car doesn’t have ls1. Im proud to drive my stang and there is nothing like it. Thats my two cents.

Even if it the stock ls1 is faster, I still have a 2002 35th Camaro SS so see if i care.

72MachOne99GT

I AM SOO FREAKING FED UP WITH THIS ARGUMENT

it can come from both sides, does nothing to benefit the debate, and has people thinking that if they are perfect drivers, their 14 second GT can beat a low 13 LS1.

to defend myself, and not come across like a turd to you guys, i DO understand what youre saying. And sure, the driver is VERY important in every race. However, you can't go into a race against a superior car and EXPECT to win. It is illogical.

But when people start debating two cars, no matter how close they are, you must assume equal drivers, equal variables. If you dont, then there is NOTHING to be gained by arguing at all. It is called Ceteris Peribus, and i've had to preach it to more people in the last week than i can recall any other time. (alot of that caused by the recent forest fire involving the cobalt SS 99-04GT debate)

But please, for sake of not making yourself seem redundant, no longer use the "well if he's a better driver plause" it doesnt work when youre trying to argue.

IF FOR SOME REASON YOU DONT UNDERSTAND YET. here is an example of the "better driver plause in effect"

"So, youve got a 99GT with 4.10's, full exhaust, and DR's huh.. "
--Yep, thats me. Want to race in your stock 99GT?
"Yea, its gonna be close. It is all gonna come down to the driver no matter."


there is one example
please feel free to PM me for several others, or to flame the hell out of me