KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER
02-19-2006, 04:43 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 11
KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER
WHAT IS EVERYS THOUGHTS ON THE KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER VS. THE VORTECH SUPERCHARGER? WHICH IS BETTER? I HAVE A 1999 GT MUSTANG AND I'M THINKING OF DOING A 6PSI KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER.
WWW.APEXMOTORSPORTS.COM
02-19-2006, 05:02 PM
#4
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,860
RE: KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER
I think in order to be able to give you more information it would help if you told us what your goals were. As in how much Hp you want to make, what times you wanted to run, daily driver or little driving? Things like that. Both a centrifugal and a roots are good in theyre own right, but both are better for certain applications than the other.
02-19-2006, 05:11 PM
#5
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 485
RE: KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER
Daily driver go with the Kenne Bell
For racing go with the Vortech
The Kenne Bell has a lot of power down low, but above 4000RPMs or so the Vortech usually makes more, but how often do you drive above 4000RPMs?
For racing go with the Vortech
The Kenne Bell has a lot of power down low, but above 4000RPMs or so the Vortech usually makes more, but how often do you drive above 4000RPMs?
02-19-2006, 05:23 PM
#7
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,375
RE: KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER
ORIGINAL: MustangMafia
I dont know if I like the idea of my daily driver seeing a lot of boost at every RPM... Therefor I would probably go with a centrifugal either way....
I dont know if I like the idea of my daily driver seeing a lot of boost at every RPM... Therefor I would probably go with a centrifugal either way....
02-19-2006, 05:24 PM
#8
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 485
RE: KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER
ORIGINAL: MustangMafia
I dont know if I like the idea of my daily driver seeing a lot of boost at every RPM... Therefor I would probably go with a centrifugal either way....
I dont know if I like the idea of my daily driver seeing a lot of boost at every RPM... Therefor I would probably go with a centrifugal either way....
If I am paying that much for something I want to feel it..
The Kenne Bell has a bypass that works off engine vacuum, so while you are putting around town you are not under boost, but you will have full boost at anything above 2000 RPMs if you put your foot into it
02-19-2006, 05:25 PM
#9
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 485
RE: KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER
ORIGINAL: SOHCtimes2
I agree with that, and also the fact that its hard to put down that much down-low power on the street anyway.
I agree with that, and also the fact that its hard to put down that much down-low power on the street anyway.
With the KB and 4.10's my 315's don't have a chance [sm=gears.gif]
02-19-2006, 05:53 PM
#10
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Smithfield. RI
Posts: 810
RE: KENNE BELL SUPERCHARGER
ORIGINAL: MustangMafia
I think in order to be able to give you more information it would help if you told us what your goals were. As in how much Hp you want to make, what times you wanted to run, daily driver or little driving? Things like that. Both a centrifugal and a roots are good in theyre own right, but both are better for certain applications than the other.
I think in order to be able to give you more information it would help if you told us what your goals were. As in how much Hp you want to make, what times you wanted to run, daily driver or little driving? Things like that. Both a centrifugal and a roots are good in theyre own right, but both are better for certain applications than the other.