4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

@breagle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #31  
2002GTAUTOVERT's Avatar
2002GTAUTOVERT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,441
From:
Default RE: @breagle

You can call me Jesus. Christ is too formal.
Old May 23, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #32  
kraze_e's Avatar
kraze_e
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 325
From:
Default RE: @breagle

ORIGINAL: 2002GTAUTOVERT

You can call me Jesus. Christ is too formal.
WOW

Is Kraze_e gonna have to slap a b!tch
Old May 23, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #33  
beastzilla02's Avatar
beastzilla02
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,421
From:
Default RE: @breagle

random post: breagles a ***.
Old May 23, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #34  
jfor441's Avatar
jfor441
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 206
Default RE: @breagle

ORIGINAL: 2002GTAUTOVERT

ORIGINAL: jfor441

ORIGINAL: 2002GTAUTOVERT

ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

ORIGINAL: 2002GTAUTOVERT

seems like everyone on here has "little man syndrome" how about we cut out the pissing contest and talk about sh*t that this board was created for.
Thats what he/you tried to start before.. and got smacked down.

He talked ****, and now he got yanked...whats the problem?
LMAO before you accuse me of something, go back and read the thread. once again i have to dumb it down, it started with something aboutsomeones car running low 11's being just a "bolt-on". i said no "BOLT ON" gt can run low - mid 11's being just a bolt-on. Obviously you dont know the definition of a "bolt-on" modular. And got "smacked down" do i really have you remind you once again this is the internet, and you should respect your elders, especially veterans.

The rough definition of a bolt-on modular is a car that has literally "bolt on" parts, such as a CAI, UDP's, cat back system, lt's etc. When you start doing any kind of cam, head, valve, F/I, nitrous, or anything requiring a tune or a professional to install, its not considered bolt-on anymore. This includes gears, seeing as the majority wont dare install them theirself as thorough knowledge is required, its not considered a "bolt-on" mod.
Listen here buddy. This is the internet. I respect people who show respect. You i don't know. I am veteran myself so i should automatically expect respect from folks? No i shouldn't. I served my country. I was honorably discharged. The start of the thread in question was about people lieing about horsepower and times. Dude says no way a bolt on GT can run 12's. He was shown that it can be done.

As for your definition of gears not being a bolt on mod? HAHAHAHAHA... I think rap shouldn't be considered music but does that make my opinion right? No. Just my opinion. Who said a bolt on's car would run low 11's huh?

Your saying anything requiring a tune is no longer a bolt on. Guess all the folks running CAI on 05 and GT's are no longer bolt ons either huh? They require a tune after CAI install.
doing laundry for the Navy barely lets you qualify as a veteran. And now youre over simplifying things, as for as a dyno tune - cams, heads, f/i, nitrous, stroked motors etc. were not talking about 197's this is about new edges.
Wanna talk about maturity huh? Good guess about me being the Navy. No I didn't do laundry for the Navy jackass. My job required much more intelligence than you can wrap your little brain around. You were the one that brought up being a veteran.

You are the douchebag in this thread. You are wrong and keep showing your ignorance with every post. BTW... thought you were done with this thread?
Old May 23, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #35  
BleedinBlue's Avatar
BleedinBlue
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,355
From: Eureka, Mo
Default RE: @breagle

ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

ORIGINAL: 2002GTAUTOVERT

as i said before, i dont know code's specs. heads and cams arent boltons my friend, thats building the damn motor. bolt-on is a generic term for sh*t a noob can do. i guess forged internals are bolt-ons now too.
Christ.

Theres just no getting thru to you is there?
This is too f'ing funny.

2002GTAUTOVERT: NO ONE has said that Code's car is bolt-on only. NO ONE has said that a bolt-on only 2V is capable of low 12's.

Didn't this whole thing start when Bregal, Bragel, Beagle, whatever, said that no bolt on 2V could hit even high 13's? I've tried to read through most of this bull****, but I haven't found the transition to low 12's...

In summary: A bolt on 2V with suspension and weight reduction is very capable of HIGH 12 second passes and up, as proven many times. What the hell is the rest of the argument about?

Now I want to know if Bagel has the cahunas to race Code (Who, I repeat, for the hard headed, has more than bolt ons, as we all know and agree)

[sm=alcoholic.gif]
Old May 23, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #36  
breagles's Avatar
breagles
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 267
From:
Default RE: @breagle

ORIGINAL: jfor441

ORIGINAL: code3GT

ORIGINAL: breagles

Any one in here live in San Antonio ? I'd be happy to race any bolt on in here . If you run a low 12 you will likely beat me . You can even use drag radials .
I'll make the trip to SAR.
Whenever you're ready . I'm here . I wont't back down from a race from a n/a stang but If you're running slicks I'm going to also .


I think Code has accepted your challenge? What you gonna do now?
Old May 23, 2007 | 07:28 PM
  #37  
breagles's Avatar
breagles
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 267
From:
Default RE: @breagle

I'll race code anyday . I'm gonna run slicks though .
Old May 23, 2007 | 07:33 PM
  #38  
BleedinBlue's Avatar
BleedinBlue
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,355
From: Eureka, Mo
Default RE: @breagle

Old May 23, 2007 | 07:38 PM
  #39  
breagles's Avatar
breagles
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 267
From:
Default RE: @breagle

I live in s.a . so just p.m. me whenever you're ready . I'm gonna take a vid of me whoopin' his a$$and post it here . We can do a grudge match 1/4 mile the winner takes home a crappy trophy on saturdays . Nothing against code either he wasn't even involved in this . All you guys make me laugh offering someone else's car up for a race instead of your own . I guess 2ooGTvert is right you all have your heads up his a$$ . And like I said cams are not bolt ons !
Old May 23, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #40  
2002GTAUTOVERT's Avatar
2002GTAUTOVERT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,441
From:
Default RE: @breagle


[/quote]

doing laundry for the Navy barely lets you qualify as a veteran. And now youre over simplifying things, as for as a dyno tune - cams, heads, f/i, nitrous, stroked motors etc. were not talking about 197's this is about new edges.
[/quote]

Wanna talk about maturity huh? Good guess about me being the Navy. No I didn't do laundry for the Navy jackass. My job required much more intelligence than you can wrap your little brain around. You were the one that brought up being a veteran.

You are the douchebag in this thread. You are wrong and keep showing your ignorance with every post. BTW... thought you were done with this thread?

[/quote]

wanna talk about maturity? lets go. the mature thing is to not even respond, you did. the mature thing is not to stoop to name calling, you did. And on top of that, the veteran comment wasnt even in reference to you, but if you wanna get in on this stupid thread (which is pretty amusing) by all means. So you didnt do laundry, a barber isnt a really large step forward. I was done with this thread, until it dawned on me i had nothing else to do, since its my day off, went to the gym this morning. And for the record, please try not to go to Army.com and look up a fake number, lets talk about intelligence what exactly was your MOS? if you were in the Army, how long was your AIT? where was Boot/Basic training at? you qualify for any additional training (airborne, OCS, etc.)? lets talk about intelligence.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.