dyno numbers

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 16, 2008 | 12:35 PM

#11

96stanGTR

1st Gear Member

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 115

From:

RE: dyno numbers

yea thats not too bad for a 2v but a s*it of money for only a few horses

Feb 16, 2008 | 02:18 PM

#12

teej281

4.6L Section Moderator

Joined: Nov 2007

Posts: 10,286

From: South Central PA

RE: dyno numbers

not to hijack this thread, but what would you guys say to 238rwhp and 281 rwtq with just catted x pipe, flowmaster catback, and an xcal 3 canned tune???put onan intake but havent dyno'd since, even though there is really no reason to redyno it with these minor mods.

Feb 16, 2008 | 06:02 PM

#13

cliffyk

TECH SAVANT

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 10,937

From: Saint Augustine, FL

RE: dyno numbers

Quote:

ORIGINAL: teej281

not to hijack this thread, but what would you guys say to 238rwhp and 281 rwtq with just catted x pipe, flowmaster catback, and an xcal 3 canned tune???put onan intake but havent dyno'd since, even though there is really no reason to redyno it with these minor mods.

[/align][/align]That's about what I'd expect without a TB & plenum; do that and retune and you'll be up around 250 peak with a much improved mid-range (the TB & plenum will let it breatheasier at WOT)...[/align]

Feb 16, 2008 | 06:35 PM

#14

2000GT4.6

6th Gear Member

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 12,575

From: United States

RE: dyno numbers

more fuel down low should get the TQ around the 300 FT/Lbs range.

Really close to what I made at full boltons, numbers are about right other than the TQ.