WS6 Vs GT
6th Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,688
From: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Actually ill disagree about the best bang for the buck. Ill say nitrous is. Again im against a few all. Execpt this one is a toss up if both have = drivers. Hoss get over this... 300 lbs is alot quit saying its not much. Dont want to call you out again but are you joking? Drive with 2 other people in your car that weigh a total of 300 lbs and you tell me if your car is the SAME and there isnt a DIFFERENCE when racing... Arr i think your car wont break 13.7 average driver. He cant drive worth junk so you will win. NO DOUBT. BUT... if he learns to drive his car too will run 13.7ish like you. LT1 are very torquey AND one thing about those cars are that the more miles on that car the better they run...
4th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,600
From: asdf
6th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,551
From: Texas
WOW..
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/s...1-in_52197.htm
this is stock trim.. most mustang 2v owners go 14s stock, and an lt respnds WAY better to mods.. u tell me whos gonna win between te op and a full exhaust lt..and thats with the extra 300lbs that GT seems to think is such a big deal.. look how the lt stays with the ls1 till top end.. they are torque monsters.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
From: Houston, Tx
IT RAN A 14.1 im confused at your point? And it was an automatic because you can tell by the shifting. Also it looks like the lt1 has skinnys in the front and Maybe MT in the rear. AND REMEMBER his friend cant drive. Im also amazed how ignorant you are hoss on weight.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,363
From:
these duma$$ f body race discussions would pan out alot better if the people actually raced instead of talking about it, it seems like every other thread is about this and either the people don't race, or they don't come back and say the conclusion. its gettin ooooooold.