4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

new track times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2009, 07:49 AM
  #21  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

I agree my ET seems proportionate to my 60ft, but the traps are nuts.

My one buddy has a 1995 Cobra with HCI, and 3.73 gear w/BFG drag radials. His best was a 13.2 @108 w/2.0 60ft.

My other buddy has a 2006 GTO with bolt ons and cam w/stock gear on BFG drags as well, and his best was a 12.5 @ 116 w/2.0 60ft.

It was clear that even guys with drag radials had trouble hooking, so considering that, i think i did okay for street tires.

I also ran a 1999 LS1 Trans Am. He was an auto (i ran him n/a on that run) with bolt ons and a 3.73 gear with street tires. He ran a 13.3 @ 105 w/2.0 60ft. Even though he beat me i was surprised he trapped less than me.

Milan Dragway is a well know track out here. I would be surprised if their timing equipment was that far off, but anything is possible.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 09:43 AM
  #22  
99GTvert
is my username.
 
99GTvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 13,807
Default

Do you already have drag radials?
99GTvert is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 10:46 AM
  #23  
agarr19
3rd Gear Member
 
agarr19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 990
Default

those times are really not that great at all i ran a 13.8 at 102 with the mods i in my sig
agarr19 is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 11:52 AM
  #24  
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
Default

He's not arguing that his ET's are great agarr....

But if you look at his best run *if it is indeed not a mistake* there is TONS TONS TONS of room for improvement.

13.6 with a 2.2 60' alone leads me to believe the car has a 13 flat in it...but then if you consider the trap, there's probably high 12's without too much issue at all....

all assuming the trap is not too far off...which I personally believe it may be....
72MachOne99GT is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 12:00 PM
  #25  
99GTvert
is my username.
 
99GTvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 13,807
Default

108 is nuts. Another member that has about the same mods (including the drive shaft, but with 3.73s) ran a 14.xx but trapped 105. I have trapped as high as 104, sans drive shaft mod with DRs (but vert's are SO HEAVY).

I think it would be **** if the OP went again at a different track and trapped 108ish. He might just be a pair of slicks away from a 12 second all motor pass...maybe.
99GTvert is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 01:13 PM
  #26  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

Here is the proof for all you non believers. My car is 212.

I hope it is legible.
Attached Thumbnails new track times-scan0000181.jpg   new track times-scan0000191.jpg  
mrtstang is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 02:40 PM
  #27  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

Bump!
mrtstang is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 04:19 PM
  #28  
fausty
4th Gear Member
 
fausty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami ,FL
Posts: 1,429
Default

No one is saying that your lying but your trap is way off what it should be for a full bolton 2v. Its common for the sensors to mess up once in a while and post errors. Check the s/s section its a comon thing.
fausty is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 06:59 PM
  #29  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

I understand that, and i agree there is something wrong with the track.

I just wanted to prove that it really happened.

I will definantely try a different track soon.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 07:42 PM
  #30  
sstang
5th Gear Member
 
sstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 2,663
Default

With drag radials you should be way faster, make sure tires are your next mod. If I were you I would get a set of track wheels. But a bolt-on 2V can't hit a 108 w/o major weight reduction thats for sure. My car ran 12.9's but I was only hitting 105 mph at a track decently close to sea level. Granted my 60's were better, even some wheel spin wouldnt have made me trap any higher really. And with the elevation of Milan, your trap has to be a few mph off.

If there is another track around, I would try it. Although I know Milan is a well known track so its sensor being wrong is odd.

Last edited by sstang; 04-16-2009 at 07:45 PM.
sstang is offline  


Quick Reply: new track times



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM.