4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

weight reduction vs adding horsepower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #1  
jmsjags's Avatar
jmsjags
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 416
From: Richmond, VA
Default weight reduction vs adding horsepower

someone posted a chart a while back showing 1/4 mile times for both of these. it was like:

3000 lbs, 300 hp = 13.0
2900 lbs, 300 hp = 12.8
2800 lbs, 300 hp = 12.6

3000 lbs, 300 hp = 13.0
3000 lbs, 310 hp = 12.8
3000 lbs, 320 hp = 12.7

anyone have the link? thanks
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #2  
Trob's Avatar
Trob
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 113
From: Kentucky
Default

A hundred pounds shaves about a tenth off your quarter mile time.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 05:29 PM
  #3  
jmsjags's Avatar
jmsjags
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 416
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Trob
A hundred pounds shaves about a tenth off your quarter mile time.
that's just an estimate. as ur times go down weight reduction becomes more beneficial though. in other words when u get down into the 10's dropping 100 pounds will give u a better ET than adding 10 hp
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 05:35 PM
  #4  
mustangman281's Avatar
mustangman281
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 0
From: tn
Default

It takes dropping 212lbs to gain 1/10th in the 1/4.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 07:23 PM
  #5  
mustang_pa's Avatar
mustang_pa
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,033
From: Contentment
Default

Originally Posted by mustangman281
It takes dropping 212lbs to gain 1/10th in the 1/4.
+1 million
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 07:33 PM
  #6  
justinschmidt1's Avatar
justinschmidt1
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,334
From: Delawere
Default

Originally Posted by mustangman281
It takes dropping 212lbs to gain 1/10th in the 1/4.
Is that serious?

It has a lot to do with the car too.

Weight reduction will help out more on a torqueless honda than a mustang

200 lbs is probably more like .3

evo 9 vs evo 10 with like the same power but a 300 lb weight differance is like .6-.7 in the 1/4
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:12 PM
  #7  
01GT4.6's Avatar
01GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,726
From: Slidell, Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by jmsjags
someone posted a chart a while back showing 1/4 mile times for both of these. it was like:

3000 lbs, 300 hp = 13.0
2900 lbs, 300 hp = 12.8
2800 lbs, 300 hp = 12.6

3000 lbs, 300 hp = 13.0
3000 lbs, 310 hp = 12.8
3000 lbs, 320 hp = 12.7

anyone have the link? thanks
those numbers seem slow, unless they are talking about HP at the crank. My race weight on my bullitts is over 3400lbs and at 320rwhp I ran a 12.4-.5 not really "driving" the car. But Ox is probably right about 200# = .1 in the 1/4.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:16 PM
  #8  
SVTeeshirt's Avatar
SVTeeshirt
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,955
From: Maryland
Default

like that guy said... sort of, its not just losing the weight, its where you lose it from, weight transfer etc etc, maybe if its just overall weight taken evenly its 212lbs/.1sec.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:21 PM
  #9  
01GT4.6's Avatar
01GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,726
From: Slidell, Louisiana
Default

there is also a big difference between removing 50#'s in seats and 50#'s in wheels.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #10  
boduke0220's Avatar
boduke0220
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,183
From: Yadkin, Nc
Default

so ( and im not argueing, just learning) if the 4000lb charger/challenger loses 200 lbs of dead ( non rolling mass) it will only gain .1 in the 1/4 mile?

what about if it got a set of big n littles instead of those 20's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.