4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Was searching on Google and found this old thread..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2009, 05:22 PM
  #41  
lilcrate
4th Gear Member
 
lilcrate's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 1,030
Default

Originally Posted by 99BlackPonyGT
where did i say that? please go **** yourself, dont take anything i say and try and drag me into this, someone mentioned someone here running mid 13s and couldnt remember who it was, so i said it was dime.
You are misunderstanding, please don't tell me to go *** myself, my face gets hot. I was comparing how quik says because somewhere a stock notch ran a 13, foxes are faster than new edges...
lilcrate is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 05:24 PM
  #42  
99BlackPonyGT
aka 'Negative Nancy'
 
99BlackPonyGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,839
Default

Originally Posted by lilcrate
You are misunderstanding, please don't tell me to go *** myself, my face gets hot. I was comparing how quik says because somewhere a stock notch ran a 13, foxes are faster than new edges...
you didnt use the sarcasm font, so i didnt get it
99BlackPonyGT is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 05:33 PM
  #43  
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Default

Originally Posted by lilcrate
You are misunderstanding, please don't tell me to go *** myself, my face gets hot. I was comparing how quik says because somewhere a stock notch ran a 13, foxes are faster than new edges...
some where was PRP which is a few miles outside Pittsburgh Pa. If you like the NE good for you, if you like foxes good for you. Run either car and see the actual times you can muster from the car.

Also to give thought to the cause, Just cause a vehicle is a newer version or a supposly improved version of the later one doesnt necessary mean its a better performing product.

Look at the basics. In the 80s[79 for the smartasses] when the foxes were designed the luxurys of them were next to nothing. Todays vehicles have alot more weight in them. More wiring, air bags and sound dampening. This all adds to a heavier vehicle. The NE motor was what 285 at its best year? a fox was 225, 60hp isnt that much of a difference when you consider youre adding close to 500lbs of weight. 500lbs is a good .5 in et difference. What was torque of the NE motor? Pushrod 302 was 300lbft.

This arguement has been going on for years, There has been alot of notches and even LX hatchs running into the 13s. It comes down to driver and track conditions really. Most ppl have the slightest clue on how to drive a vehicle down the 1320, they all try and sit gangsta.

But who really cares about 13s stock? 13s from a stock vehicle was impressive over a decade ago. Stock vehicles are into the 11s today, quit living in the past
Quik is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 05:36 PM
  #44  
POISND U
5th Gear Member
 
POISND U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,569
Default

I'm still trying to give a damn about a 4 year old thread....

nope. still not working....
POISND U is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 05:37 PM
  #45  
justinschmidt1
4th Gear Member
 
justinschmidt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Delawere
Posts: 1,334
Default

Originally Posted by Radii
5.56 gears?????

WTF... you be like doing 25 MPH at 7k RPM.
it wouldnt be that bad....4.10s with 26 inch tire should be about 2500 rpms @70

4.88 would be about 3k, 5.56 would be about 3400 @ 70

but this is assuming you have the o/d ratio of .67, if you had a 6 speed with a .5 ratio, you could run 5.56 gears and only be at 2500 rpms @ 70, crazy isnt it?

As far as running the 1/4 mile, the 4.56/4.88 gear wouldnt really be a bad gear for a n/a 99-04 GT

You want to be crossing the line @ redline, that is the optimal gear so with a 4.88 gear and a 28 inch tall tire, you could be trapping 102 mph @ 6k so that would be a good setup for the track

but you would have to run 28 inch tire.

I would like to feel what its like to ride in a 4.56 geared auto gt compared to 3.73s, probably night and day
justinschmidt1 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 05:37 PM
  #46  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Originally Posted by POISND U
I'm still trying to give a damn about a 4 year old thread....

nope. still not working....
Exactly!
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 06:14 PM
  #47  
ct_white_stang
4th Gear Member
 
ct_white_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 1,046
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
reread the slip!!!!!!! best was 13.3 @ 101. best mph was 102
ive been a member since 03, i havent posted much since i left the Stang world and been toying with GMs. You can find the mods

Car at the time had 355s, K&N drop in filter, BBK H Pipe, Flows dumped. Stock trans, stock shifter, stock replacement clutch, stock suspension, Had saleen replicas 15x7 with worn QTPs. car had a 155k miles on it when it ran the times. stock timing at 10*

slipped clutch at 3500 NO LIFT SHIFTs at 4500.

There is no reason to lie about the car, nothing to prove from hiding things. I like the look of new edges but the weight of them vs the motor output is their downfall from the factory. Not saying the fox is the greatest car but it was a great platform to work off of. Quick, Light and good wheel base.

the Notch in question was 3100lbs with me in it and it was a stripper from the factory. a New Edge on the highway would destroy a fox, on the 1320 it comes down to driver.
So your stang was geared too? Unless I am uneducated I didn't think they came with this stock?
ct_white_stang is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 07:02 PM
  #48  
gif4445
4th Gear Member
 
gif4445's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,546
Default

Originally Posted by 99BlackPonyGT
in fact, i personally think youre all ****ing idiots for debating this...no car is consistant at every track.... track prep and DA are huge factors...two equal cars can run a second part at different tracks, but it doesnt make one slower than the other... hell you can lose a second by switching to a different track in another part of the country...line a PI 4.6 up with a bone stock 5.0 fox at the same track, same day, right next to each other, and the PI gt will win, hands down....but saying that "stock gts run 14.0, and foxes run 14.4" is stupid....atleast find real world slips and correct them for DA and then compare that, even though thats weak too
x10000000000

All this bitching is pissing me off.
gif4445 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 07:10 PM
  #49  
stangalator
4th Gear Member
 
stangalator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 1,306
Default

crazy kids and your.... drugs
stangalator is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 07:44 PM
  #50  
grif62
2nd Gear Member
 
grif62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Winter Springs, Flordia
Posts: 398
Default

Rofl on this thread!
grif62 is offline  


Quick Reply: Was searching on Google and found this old thread..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.